Literature DB >> 3205669

Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance.

G Rhodes1.   

Abstract

The encoding and relative importance of first-order (discrete) and second-order (configural) features in mental representations of unfamiliar faces have been investigated. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (KYST) was carried out on similarity judgments of forty-one photographs of faces (homogeneous with respect to sex, race, facial expression, and, to a lesser extent, age). A large set of ratings, measurements, and ratios of measurements of the faces was regressed against the three-dimensional KYST solution in order to determine the first-order and second-order features used to judge similarity. Parameters characterizing both first-order and second-order features emerged as important determinants of facial similarity. First-order feature parameters characterizing the appearance of the eyes, eyebrows, and mouth, and second-order feature parameters characterizing the position of the eyes, spatial relations between the internal features, and chin shape correlated with the dimensions of the KYST solution. There was little difference in the extent to which first-order and second-order features were encoded. Two higher-level parameters, age and weight, were also used to judge similarity. The implications of these results for mental representations of faces are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3205669     DOI: 10.1068/p170043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  39 in total

1.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces.

Authors:  M A Webster; O H MacLin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  A multidimensional scaling approach to mental multiplication.

Authors:  Thomas L Griffiths; Michael L Kalish
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

3.  Looking like a criminal: stereotypical black facial features promote face source memory error.

Authors:  Heather M Kleider; Sarah E Cavrak; Leslie R Knuycky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

4.  A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-23

5.  FFA and OFA Encode Distinct Types of Face Identity Information.

Authors:  Maria Tsantani; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Katherine Storrs; Adrian Lloyd Williams; Carolyn McGettigan; Lúcia Garrido
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  The development of face processing in autism.

Authors:  Noah J Sasson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-04

7.  Avatar assistant: improving social skills in students with an ASD through a computer-based intervention.

Authors:  Ingrid Maria Hopkins; Michael W Gower; Trista A Perez; Dana S Smith; Franklin R Amthor; F Casey Wimsatt; Fred J Biasini
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-11

8.  Confidence-accuracy relations for faces and scenes: roles of features and familiarity.

Authors:  Mark Tippens Reinitz; Julie Anne Séguin; William Peria; Geoffrey R Loftus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

Review 9.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

10.  The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification.

Authors:  A J O'Toole; K A Deffenbacher; D Valentin; K McKee; D Huff; H Abdi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.