Literature DB >> 9196691

Sex classification is better with three-dimensional head structure than with image intensity information.

A J O'Toole1, T Vetter, N F Troje, H H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

The sex of a face is perhaps its most salient features. A principal components analysis (PCA) was applied separately to the three-dimensional (3-D) structure and graylevel image (GLI) data from laser-scanned human heads. Individual components from both analyses captured information related to the sex of the face. Notably, single projection coefficients characterized complex differences between the 3-D structure of male and female heads and between male and female GLI maps. In a series of simulations, the quality of the information available in the 3-D head versus GLI data for predicting the sex of the face has been compared. The results indicated that the 3-D head data supported more accurate sex classification than the GLI data, across a range of PCA-compressed (dimensionality-reduced) representations of the heads. This kind of dual face representation can give insight into the nature of the information available to humans for categorizing and remembering faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9196691     DOI: 10.1068/p260075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

1.  The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification.

Authors:  A J O'Toole; K A Deffenbacher; D Valentin; K McKee; D Huff; H Abdi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

2.  Expertise for upright faces improves the precision but not the capacity of visual working memory.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Michael S Pratte; Christopher F Angeloni; Frank Tong
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Biological Sex Determines Whether Faces Look Real.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013

4.  The spectacular human nose: an amplifier of individual quality?

Authors:  Se Kristine Rognmo Mikalsen; Ivar Folstad; Nigel Gilles Yoccoz; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Geometric facial gender scoring: objectivity of perception.

Authors:  Syed Zulqarnain Gilani; Kathleen Rooney; Faisal Shafait; Mark Walters; Ajmal Mian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The utility of multiple synthesized views in the recognition of unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Scott P Jones; Dominic M Dwyer; Michael B Lewis
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Filtered beauty in Oslo and Tokyo: A spatial frequency analysis of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Morten Øvervoll; Ilaria Schettino; Hikaru Suzuki; Matia Okubo; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Gender classification based on geometry features of palm image.

Authors:  Ming Wu; Yubo Yuan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-04-29

9.  An automatic approach for classification and categorisation of lip morphological traits.

Authors:  Hawraa H Abbas; Yulia Hicks; Alexei Zhurov; David Marshall; Peter Claes; Caryl Wilson-Nagrani; Stephen Richmond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.