Literature DB >> 1508054

Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.

J R Vokey1, J D Read.   

Abstract

Typical faces are more poorly discriminated on tests of recognition than are atypical faces, an effect suggested to mediate similar findings for attractive or likable faces. We tested the hypothesis that the effect of typicality on recognition is a function of context-free familiarity and memorability, which function in opposition. Two orthogonal principal components were extracted from subjects' ratings of faces for typicality, familiarity, attractiveness, likability, and memorability--one consisting of the ratings of familiarity, attractiveness, and likability, and reflecting context-free familiarity, and the other consisting of the memorability rating. As expected, typicality loaded equally (r approximately .66), but with opposite sign, on both components. In subsequent experiments, both components were found to be significant and additive predictors of face recognition with no residual effect of typicality. General familiarity decreased discrimination, and the memorability component enhanced it, supporting the hypothesis. The results are discussed in terms of the mirror effect.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1508054     DOI: 10.3758/bf03199666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

3.  Typicality, familiarity and the recognition of male and female faces.

Authors:  J R Vokey; J D Read
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1988-12

4.  Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; J E Leslie
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-09

5.  Recognizing familiar faces: the role of distinctiveness and familiarity.

Authors:  T Valentine; V Bruce
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-09

6.  The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces.

Authors:  T Valentine; V Bruce
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Likability of targets and distractors in facial recognition.

Authors:  J H Mueller; M Heesacker; M J Ross
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1984

8.  The mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01

9.  Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1982-02

10.  Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces.

Authors:  E Winograd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1981-05
View more
  38 in total

1.  The face typicality-recognizability relationship: encoding or retrieval locus?

Authors:  K A Deffenbacher; J Johanson; T Vetter; A J O'Toole
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  The prototype effect in face recognition: extension and limits.

Authors:  R Cabeza; V Bruce; T Kato; M Oda
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

3.  Shades of the mirror effect: recognition of faces with and without sunglasses.

Authors:  W E Hockley; D H Hemsworth; A Consoli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

4.  Associative interference in recognition memory: a dual-process account.

Authors:  Michael F Verde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

5.  The role of facial attractiveness and facial masculinity/femininity in sex classification of faces.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hoss; Jennifer L Ramsey; Angela M Griffin; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

7.  "Just another pretty face": a multidimensional scaling approach to face attractiveness and variability.

Authors:  Timothy Potter; Olivier Corneille; Kirsten I Ruys; Ginwan Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

8.  When false recognition is out of control: the case of facial conjunctions.

Authors:  Todd C Jones; James C Bartlett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

9.  Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Jessica M Jankowitsch; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Locating attractiveness in the face space: faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype.

Authors:  Timothy Potter; Olivier Corneille
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.