Literature DB >> 9470217

Improving vision: neural compensation for optical defocus.

M Mon-Williams1, J R Tresilian, N C Strang, P Kochhar, J P Wann.   

Abstract

Anecdotal reports abound of vision improving in myopia after a period of time without refractive correction. We explored whether this effect is due to an increased tolerance of blur or whether it reflects a genuine improvement in vision. Our results clearly demonstrated a marked improvement in the ability to detect and recognize letters following prolonged exposure to optical defocus. We ensured that ophthalmic change did not occur, and thus the phenomenon must be due to a neural compensation for the defocus condition. A second set of experiments measured contrast sensitivity and found a decrease in sensitivity to mid-range (5-25 cycles deg-1) spatial frequencies following exposure to optical defocus. The results of the two experiments may be explained by the unmasking of low contrast, high spatial frequency information via a two-stage process: (1) the pattern of relative channel outputs is maintained during optical defocus by the depression of mid-range spatial frequency channels; (2) channel outputs are pooled prior to the production of the final percept. The second set of experiments also provided some evidence of inter-ocular transfer, indicating that the adaptation process is occurring at binocular sites in the cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9470217      PMCID: PMC1688761          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  New design principles for visual acuity letter charts.

Authors:  I L Bailey; J E Lovie
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1976-11

2.  Consequences of monocular diplopia for the contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  R L Woods; A Bradley; D A Atchison
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Decreased uncorrected vision after a period of distance fixation with spectacle wear.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; N A Brennan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: evidence for spatial primitives in human vision.

Authors:  R J Watt; M J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Spatial selectivity of contrast adaptation: models and data.

Authors:  M A Georgeson; M G Harris
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Spatial filters and the localization of luminance changes in human vision.

Authors:  R J Watt; M J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Spatial frequency interference effects and interpolation in vernier acuity.

Authors:  M J Morgan; R J Watt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Contrast detection and detection of contrast modulation for noise gratings.

Authors:  J H Jamar; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Glasgow Acuity Cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in children.

Authors:  P V McGraw; B Winn
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  40 in total

1.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Frank Thorn; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Aging and blur adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Joseph L Hardy; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Effect of lens-induced myopia on visual cortex activity: a functional MR imaging study.

Authors:  A Mirzajani; E Sarlaki; H H Kharazi; M Tavan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Visual performance after correcting higher order aberrations in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Neural compensation for long-term asymmetric optical blur to improve visual performance in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Effects of optical blur reduction on equivalent intrinsic blur.

Authors:  Ali Kord Valeshabad; Justin Wanek; J Jason McAnany; Mahnaz Shahidi
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 9.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.