Literature DB >> 16545421

Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes.

Elise Harb1, Frank Thorn, David Troilo.   

Abstract

Accommodation has long been suspected to be involved in the development of myopia because near work, particularly reading, is known to be a risk factor. In this study, we measured several dynamic characteristics of accommodative behavior during extended periods of reading under close-to-natural conditions in 20 young emmetropic and stable myopic subjects. Accommodative responses, errors, and variability (including power spectrum analysis) were analyzed and related to accommodative demand and subject refractive error. All accommodative behaviors showed large inter-subject variability at all of the reading demands. Accommodative lags and variability significantly increased with closer demands for all subjects (ANOVA, p<0.05). Myopes had significantly greater variability in their accommodation responses compared to emmetropes (ANOVA, p<0.05) and had larger accommodative lags at further reading distances (unpaired t test p<0.05). Power spectrum analysis showed a significant increase in the power of accommodative microfluctuations with closer demands (ANOVA, p<0.05) and with increasing myopia at the closest reading demand (ANOVA, p<0.01). The difference in the stability of the accommodative behavior between individuals with different refractive states suggests a possible relationship between variability in accommodation and the development of myopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16545421      PMCID: PMC1892179          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  85 in total

1.  How good is the match between the plane of the text and the plane of focus during reading?

Authors:  F Schaeffel; S Weiss; J Seidel
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Blur detection thresholds in childhood myopia: single and dual target presentation.

Authors:  Katrina L Schmid; D Robert Iskander; Roger W H Li; Marion H Edwards; John K F Lew
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Wavefront aberration and its relationship to the accommodative stimulus-response function in myopic subjects.

Authors:  Charlotte A Hazel; Michael J Cox; Niall C Strang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Blur adaptation in myopes.

Authors:  Mark Rosenfield; Susan E Hong; Sini George
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Differences in adaptation of tonic accommodation with refractive state.

Authors:  N A McBrien; M Millodot
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The relationship between tonic accommodation and refractive error.

Authors:  N A McBrien; M Millodot
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Myopia and level of education.

Authors:  M D Al-Bdour; T A Odat; A A Tahat
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.597

9.  Large sample study of the effects of phenylephrine 2.5% eyedrops on the amplitude of accommodation in man.

Authors:  G Gimpel; M J Doughty; W M Lyle
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Refraction, nearwork and education. A population study in Newfoundland.

Authors:  A Richler; J C Bear
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1980-06
View more
  36 in total

1.  Accommodation in emmetropic and myopic young adults wearing bifocal soft contact lenses.

Authors:  Janice Tarrant; Holly Severson; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Blur Detection, Depth of Field, and Accommodation in Emmetropic and Hyperopic Children.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Quantification of age-related and per diopter accommodative changes of the lens and ciliary muscle in the emmetropic human eye.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Loraine T Sinnott; Mark A Bullimore; Peter A Wassenaar; Petra Schmalbrock; Chiu-Yen Kao; Samuel Patz; Donald O Mutti; Adrian Glasser; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Impact of Cognitive Demand during Sustained Near Tasks in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Ruth E Manny; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Measuring changes in ciliary muscle thickness with accommodation in young adults.

Authors:  Laura Ashley Lossing; Loraine T Sinnott; Chiu-Yen Kao; Kathryn Richdale; Melissa D Bailey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  The stability of steady state accommodation in human infants.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Receding and disparity cues aid relaxation of accommodation.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  The use of cues to convergence and accommodation in naïve, uninstructed participants.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.