Literature DB >> 20130284

Neural compensation for long-term asymmetric optical blur to improve visual performance in keratoconic eyes.

Ramkumar Sabesan1, Geunyoung Yoon.   

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate whether long-term visual experience with irregular optical blur compensates for the impact of higher-order aberration on visual performance in keratoconic (KC) eyes. Methods. The aberrations and high (100%)- and low (20%)-contrast tumbling E visual acuity (VA) were measured in four moderate KC eyes in which the subjects were wearing their own prescribed soft toric contact lenses over a 6-mm pupil. VA was measured in three emmetropic normal eyes for comparison with each of the four KC eyes. An adaptive optics system was used to correct the aberration of the normal eye and to induce the aberration of the KC eye simultaneously during vision testing. The magnitude of neural compensation was defined as improvement in VA in each KC eye compared with the normal eyes with KC aberrations. Results. Mean total and higher-order root mean square errors in the KC eyes with contact lenses were 2.72 +/- 0.83 mum and 1.36 +/- 0.29 mum, respectively, for a 6-mm pupil. Residual RMS wavefront error in induction of KC aberrations on normal eyes was approximately 0.1 mum in all cases. Each KC eye had statistically better high (P < 0.02)- and low (P < 0.03)-contrast VA than the three normal eyes. Mean compensation for high-contrast VA in logMAR was 0.12 +/- 0.09, corresponding to an improvement of 23.8%. A similar result was obtained for low-contrast VA. The magnitude of compensation increased with the severity of KC aberrations. Conclusions. In KC eyes, the neural visual system compensates for long-term visual experience with an asymmetrically blurred retinal image, resulting in improved visual performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20130284      PMCID: PMC2904023          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  23 in total

1.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Blur adaptation and myopia.

Authors:  Sini George; Mark Rosenfield
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Senescence of spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity. II. Matching under natural viewing conditions.

Authors:  Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; Katsunori Okajima; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Visual performance after correcting higher order aberrations in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics.

Authors:  J Liang; D R Williams; D T Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 6.  Biomicroscopic signs and disease severity in keratoconus. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Group.

Authors:  K Zadnik; J T Barr; M O Gordon; T B Edrington
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels.

Authors:  M A Georgeson; G D Sullivan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Characterizing the wave aberration in eyes with keratoconus or penetrating keratoplasty using a high-dynamic range wavefront sensor.

Authors:  Seth Pantanelli; Scott MacRae; Tae Moon Jeong; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  30 in total

1.  Visual performance with wave aberration correction after penetrating, deep anterior lamellar, or endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Seth M Pantanelli; Ramkumar Sabesan; Steven S T Ching; Geunyoung Yoon; Holly B Hindman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Advances in understanding the molecular basis of the first steps in color vision.

Authors:  Lukas Hofmann; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Optics and neural adaptation jointly limit human stereovision.

Authors:  Cherlyn J Ng; Randolph Blake; Martin S Banks; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Austin Roorda; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Tiffanie T Yu; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  Adaptive optics for studying visual function: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  LogMAR and Stereoacuity in Keratoconus Corrected with Spectacles and Rigid Gas-permeable Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Sangeetha Metlapally; Parthasarathi Kalaiselvan; Clifton M Schor; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.