Literature DB >> 9438960

Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent.

B Roskos-Ewoldsen1, T P McNamara, A L Shelton, W Carr.   

Abstract

Previous research on spatial memory indicated that memories of small layouts were orientation dependent (orientation specific) but that memories of large layouts were orientation independent (orientation free). Two experiments investigated the relation between layout size and orientation dependency. Participants learned a small or a large 4-point path (Experiment 1) or a large display of objects (Experiment 2) and then made judgments of relative direction from imagined headings that were either the same as or different from the single studied orientation. Judgments were faster and more accurate when the imagined heading was the same as the studied orientation (i.e., aligned) than when the imagined heading differed from the studied orientation (i.e., misaligned). This alignment effect was present for both small and large layouts. These results indicate that location is encoded in an orientation-dependent manner regardless of layout size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9438960     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.1.215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  31 in total

1.  View dependence in scene recognition after active learning.

Authors:  C G Christou; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  Viewpoint alignment and response conflict during spatial judgment.

Authors:  Myeong-Ho Sohn; Richard A Carlson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

Review 3.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

4.  Do you know where your fingers have been? Explicit knowledge of the spatial layout of the keyboard in skilled typists.

Authors:  Xianyun Liu; Matthew J C Crump; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

5.  Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation.

Authors:  David Waller; Eric Hodgson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Egocentric and nonegocentric coding in memory for spatial layout: evidence from scene recognition.

Authors:  David Waller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

7.  Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information.

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Douglas W Cunningham; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-23

8.  Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: head, body, and the self-to-array axis.

Authors:  David Waller; Yvonne Lippa; Adam Richardson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-02-20

9.  First-perspective spatial alignment effects from real-world exploration.

Authors:  Paul N Wilson; Duncan A Wilson; Laura Griffiths; Sarah Fox
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

10.  Active navigation and orientation-free spatial representations.

Authors:  Hong-Jin Sun; George S W Chan; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.