Literature DB >> 15078044

Active navigation and orientation-free spatial representations.

Hong-Jin Sun1, George S W Chan, Jennifer L Campos.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the orientation dependency of spatial representations following various learning conditions. We assessed the spatial representations of human participants after they had learned a complex spatial layout via map learning, via navigating within a real environment, or via navigating through a virtual simulation of that environment. Performances were compared between conditions involving (1) multiple- versus single-body orientation, (2) active versus passive learning, and (3) high versus low levels of proprioceptive information. Following learning, the participants were required to produce directional judgments to target landmarks. Results showed that the participants developed orientation-specific spatial representations following map learning and passive learning, as indicated by better performance when tested from the initial learning orientation. These results suggest that neither the number of vantage points nor the level of proprioceptive information experienced are determining factors; rather, it is the active aspect of direct navigation that leads to the development of orientation-free representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15078044     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

Review 1.  Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology.

Authors:  J M Loomis; J J Blascovich; A C Beall
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-11

2.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Misaligned maps lead to predictable errors.

Authors:  M J Rossano; D H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Orientation-specificity in kinesthetic spatial learning: the role of multiple orientations.

Authors:  C C Presson; N DeLange; M D Hazelrigg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

5.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information.

Authors:  G W Evans; K Pezdek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-01

7.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation.

Authors:  P W Thorndyke; B Hayes-Roth
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task.

Authors:  Melissa J Kearns; William H Warren; Andrew P Duchon; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of relative path length.

Authors:  Hong-Jin Sun; Jennifer L Campos; George S W Chan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  7 in total

1.  Are allocentric spatial reference frames compatible with theories of Enactivism?

Authors:  Sabine U König; Caspar Goeke; Tobias Meilinger; Peter König
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 2.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

3.  Seeing ahead: experience and language in spatial perspective.

Authors:  Tracy Packiam Alloway; Martin Corley; Michael Ramscar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

4.  Imaginal repositioning in everyday environments: effects of testing method and setting.

Authors:  Mark May
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-07

5.  Self-motion improves head direction cell tuning.

Authors:  Michael E Shinder; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reference frames in learning from maps and navigation.

Authors:  Tobias Meilinger; Julia Frankenstein; Katsumi Watanabe; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Christoph Hölscher
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-22

7.  Walking through doorways causes forgetting: situation models and experienced space.

Authors:  Gabriel A Radvansky; David E Copeland
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.