Literature DB >> 1636038

Performance characteristics and image fidelity of gray-scale monitors.

S J Dwyer1, B K Stewart, J W Sayre, D R Aberle, M I Boechat, J C Honeyman, J M Boehme, H Roehrig, T L Ji, G J Blaine.   

Abstract

Gray-scale monitors are an essential element of electronic radiology, and their ability to provide images that are perceived to be identical to those available on conventional or laser-printed film is crucial to success of electronic radiology. Image fidelity is measured in physical characteristics (luminance, dynamic range, distortion, resolution, and noise) and with psychophysical techniques, including receiver operator characteristics analysis with clinical images and testing with contrast-detail patterns to determine threshold contrast. Currently, laser-printed images facilitate greater information transfer than does a gray-scale monitor because of their higher absolute luminance (500 ft-L vs 60 ft-L), greater perceived dynamic range, and better spatial resolution. In the near future, the developments of gray-scale monitors with 150-200 ft-L luminance, a display standard based on just noticeable differences, and algorithms to improve similarities between gray-scale display images and laser-printed images will help increase the acceptability of monitors as a means to make primary diagnoses.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1636038     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.12.4.1636038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  11 in total

1.  Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.

Authors:  Jihong Wang; Ken Compton; Qi Peng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Three-dimensional virtual cholangioscopy: a reliable tool for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Michele Simone; Didier Mutter; Francesco Rubino; Erik Dutson; Catherine Roy; Luc Soler; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Frequency and impact of high-resolution monitor failure in a filmless imaging department.

Authors:  E L Siegel; B I Reiner; M Cadogan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Contrast sensitivity of digital imaging display systems: contrast threshold dependency on object type and implications for monitor quality assurance and quality control in PACS.

Authors:  Jihong Wang; Jun Xu; Veera Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Radiology services for remote communities: cost minimisation study of telemedicine.

Authors:  P A Halvorsen; I S Kristiansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-25

Review 6.  A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.

Authors:  J Wang; S Langer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Image data compression.

Authors:  M A Goldberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  The laser film digitizer: density, contrast, and resolution.

Authors:  T N Teslow
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Quality control of cathode-ray tube monitors for medical imaging using a simple photometer.

Authors:  D M Parsons; Y Kim; D R Haynor
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Displaying radiologic images on personal computers.

Authors:  T Gillespy; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.