Literature DB >> 5972182

The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.

F W Campbell, J J Kulikowski, J Levinson.   

Abstract

1. Visual resolving power is known to be poorer for objects oriented obliquely as compared with horizontal and vertical orientations. Experiments were designed to evaluate the optical and neurophysiological factors involved.2. Gratings with a sinusoidal light distribution were generated on the face of an oscilloscope. Spatial frequency and contrast could be varied while keeping the mean luminance of the grating constant.3. Using a homatropinized eye with an artificial pupil and carefully corrected refraction, high resolution in the vertical and horizontal meridians as compared with the oblique meridians was found for gratings ranging in spatial frequency from 1 to 35 c/deg.4. It is concluded from the similar behaviour of low and high frequency gratings that neither focus errors nor optical aniseikonia can account for these findings.5. Additional proof that optical factors cannot significantly account for these preferred directions of resolution was obtained by forming interference fringes directly on the retina using a neon-helium laser as a coherent light source.6. Similar orientational changes in resolution were found by by-passing the dioptrics with interference fringes. It is concluded that the effect is due to some orientational inequality in the visual nervous system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1966        PMID: 5972182      PMCID: PMC1395930          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  6 in total

1.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visual discrimination and orientation.

Authors:  M M TAYLOR
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1963-06

3.  Meridional variations in visual acuity and eye movements during fixation.

Authors:  J NACHMIAS
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1960-06

4.  Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye.

Authors:  O H SCHADE
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1956-09

5.  Accommodative astigmatism and patten acuity.

Authors:  J Beck
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1965-09

6.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

  6 in total
  81 in total

1.  Contrast sensitivity in humans with abnormal visual experience.

Authors:  R D Freeman; L N Thibos
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Spatial-frequency-contingent color aftereffects: adaptation with two-dimensional stimulus patterns.

Authors:  W R Webster; R H Day; O Gillies; B Crassini
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-01

Review 3.  The functional roles of feedback projections in the visual system.

Authors:  Tian-De Shou
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Predictions of postoperative visual outcome in subjects with cataract: a preoperative and postoperative study.

Authors:  William A Douthwaite; Marta Vianya-Estopà; David B Elliott
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The same binding in contour integration and crowding.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The locus of color sensation: cortical color loss and the chromatic visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Michael A Crognale; Chad S Duncan; Hannah Shoenhard; Dwight J Peterson; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The effects of spatial phase on reaction time to spatially filtered images.

Authors:  J G May; J M Brown; C Gutierrez; M Donlon
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

Review 8.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Analysis of the visual spatiotemporal properties of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Rain G Bosworth; Charles E Wright; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The distribution of oriented contours in the real world.

Authors:  D M Coppola; H R Purves; A N McCoy; D Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.