Literature DB >> 10843254

A controlled evaluation of tuned-aperture computed tomography applied to digital spot mammography.

R L Webber1, H R Underhill, R I Freimanis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to compare the detection accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) modalities of tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT) with that of conventional 2-dimensional (2D) digital spot mammograms. A standardized mammographic phantom was placed beneath cadaveric breast tissues of varying densities. Five radiologists were asked to detect as many objects (specks, fibers, and low-contrast masses) as possible from 90 displays in a controlled and factorially balanced multivariate experiment. Radiographic exposure was varied systematically, and projections were averaged to ensure stochastic comparability. Scores were weighted to eliminate task-specific bias and were analyzed by multivariate analyses of variance. All display modalities based on the linear application of the 3D TACT reconstruction method yielded significantly higher detection scores for all tasks than did conventional 2D digital spot mammography, which served as the scientific control modality. This effect was found to be statistically significant (P < .001) in spite of significant variations between tissues (P < .001), observers (P < .001), and exposures (P < .01). TACT may be a promising alternative or enhancement to conventional 2D digital mammography for tasks well simulated by this experimental design.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10843254      PMCID: PMC3453191          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  Lesion conspicuity, structured noise, and film reader error.

Authors:  H L Kundel; G Revesz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Restoration of digital multiplane tomosynthesis by a constrained iteration method.

Authors:  U E Ruttimann; R A Groenhuis; R L Webber
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Breast imaging. A critical aspect of breast conserving treatment.

Authors:  N L Sadowsky; A Semine; J R Harris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT). Theory and application for three-dimensional dento-alveolar imaging.

Authors:  R L Webber; R A Horton; D A Tyndall; J B Ludlow
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Basic principles of mammographic diagnosis.

Authors:  L Tabár; P B Dean
Journal:  Diagn Imaging Clin Med       Date:  1985

7.  Spatial resolution in digital mammography.

Authors:  N Karssemeijer; J T Frieling; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Stereotaxic instrument for needle biopsy of the mamma.

Authors:  J Bolmgren; B Jacobson; B Nordenström
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 11.105

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Digital tomosynthesis-experiences with a new imaging device for the dental field.

Authors:  Christoph M Ziegler; Manfred Franetzki; Tina Denig; Joachim Mühling; Stefan Hassfeld
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Clinical potential of digital linear tomosynthesis imaging of total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tsutomu Gomi; Hiroshi Hirano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; H Page McAdams
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.528

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.