Literature DB >> 15270583

Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.

Ajay Kapur1, Paul L Carson, Jeffrey Eberhard, Mitchell M Goodsitt, Kai Thomenius, Murtuza Lokhandwalla, Donald Buckley, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Mark A Helvie, Rebecca C Booi, Gerald L LeCarpentier, Ramon Q Erkamp, Heang-Ping Chan, J Brian Fowlkes, Jerry A Thomas, Cynthia E Landberg.   

Abstract

This paper describes work aimed at combining 3D ultrasound with full-field digital mammography via a semi-automatic prototype ultrasound scanning mechanism attached to the digital mammography system gantry. Initial efforts to obtain high x-ray and ultrasound image quality through a compression paddle are proving successful. Registration between the x-ray mammogram and ultrasound image volumes is quite promising when the breast is stably compressed. This prototype system takes advantage of many synergies between the co-registered digital mammography and pulse-echo ultrasound image data used for breast cancer detection and diagnosis. In addition, innovative combinations of advanced US and X-ray applications are being implemented and tested along with the basic modes. The basic and advanced applications are those that should provide relatively independent information about the breast tissues. Advanced applications include x-ray tomosynthesis, for 3D delineation of mammographic structures, and non-linear elasticity and 3D color flow imaging by ultrasound, for mechanical and physiological information unavailable from conventional, non-contrast x-ray and ultrasound imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15270583      PMCID: PMC2921830          DOI: 10.1177/153303460400300402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  20 in total

Review 1.  Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Measuring the nonlinear elastic properties of tissue-like phantoms.

Authors:  Ramon Q Erkamp; Andrei R Skovoroda; Stanislav Y Emelianov; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 3.  The role of US in breast imaging.

Authors:  V P Jackson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Occult breast masses: use of a mammographic localizing grid for US evaluation.

Authors:  W F Conway; C W Hayes; W H Brewer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Breast sonography.

Authors:  L W Bassett; C Kimme-Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue.

Authors:  S S Kaplan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Real-time breast sonography: application in 300 consecutive patients.

Authors:  S V Hilton; G R Leopold; L K Olson; S A Willson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography.

Authors:  W Buchberger; A Niehoff; P Obrist; P DeKoekkoek-Doll; M Dünser
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.875

9.  Automated and hand-held breast US: effect on patient management.

Authors:  L W Bassett; C Kimme-Smith; L K Sutherland; R H Gold; D Sarti; W King
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  24 in total

1.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 3.  [Mammography screening in Germany].

Authors:  S Diekmann; F Diekmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Evaluating thin compression paddles for mammographically compatible ultrasound.

Authors:  Rebecca C Booi; Jochen F Krücker; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Matthew O'Donnell; Ajay Kapur; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Marilyn A Roubidoux; J Brian Fowlkes; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Robot guidance of an ultrasound probe toward a 3D region of interest detected through X-ray mammography.

Authors:  Marie-Aude Vitrani; Anja Marx; R Zvan Iordache; Serge Muller; Guillaume Morel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  A Standard Mammography Unit - Standard 3D Ultrasound Probe Fusion Prototype: First Results.

Authors:  Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Sebastian M Jud; Peter A Fasching; Arndt Hartmann; Marcus Radicke; Claudia Rauh; Michael Uder; Marius Wunderle; Paul Gass; Hanna Langemann; Matthias W Beckmann; Julius Emons
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  [Future of mammography-based imaging].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; T Wittenberg; T Michel; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann; C Rauh; S M Jud; B Brehm; M Meier-Meitinger; G Anton; M Uder; P A Fasching
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Testing a dual-modality system that combines full-field digital mammography and automated breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Christopher L Vaughan; Tania S Douglas; Qonita Said-Hartley; Roland V Baasch; James A Boonzaier; Brian C Goemans; John Harverson; Michael W Mingay; Shuaib Omar; Raphael V Smith; Nielen C Venter; Heidi S Wilson
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 1.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.