Literature DB >> 9248315

Patient-based health status measurement in clinical practice: a study of its impact on epilepsy patients' care.

A K Wagner1, B L Ehrenberg, T A Tran, K M Bungay, D J Cynn, W H Rogers.   

Abstract

The objective was to assess the potential benefits of the routine use of the MOS SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) in the care of ambulatory patients. The design was a longitudinal, prospective, randomized, controlled study set in the outpatient neurology clinic at the New England Medical Center. There were 163 consecutive patients with epilepsy who had 210 follow-up visits with one of two epileptologists. The patients completed the SF-36 before the patient-physician encounter and the forms were optically scanned. The SF-36 results of the intervention group patients were given to the physicians before the encounter and withheld for control group patients. For intervention group patients, the physicians completed a questionnaire assessing the impact of the SF-36 on the process of care. After the visit, all patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire. The main outcome measures were the physicians' responses to standardized questions about the usefulness of the SF-36 for communication with and management of epilepsy patients and the patients' responses to standardized questions about their satisfaction with care. The physicians indicated that the SF-36 provided new information in 63% of the intervention group encounters. A change in therapy was prompted in 13%. The physicians rated the SF-36 as at least moderately useful for communication in 14% of the encounters and to management in 8%. The lower (indicating worse health status) the patients' SF-36 scale scores, the more useful the SF-36 results were rated by the physicians for communication and management. It was concluded that the routine use of health status measures may enhance patients' care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9248315     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018479209369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  24 in total

1.  Health status information in clinical practice: the development and testing of patient profile reports.

Authors:  L E Kazis; J J Anderson; R F Meenan
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Repeatability of automated ambulatory blood pressure measurements.

Authors:  L M Prisant; A A Carr; P B Bottini; W O Thompson; R B Rhoades
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  How to help your patients function better.

Authors:  L V Rubenstein; D R Calkins; A Fink; R T Young; P D Cleary; A M Jette; J Kosecoff; A R Davies; T L Delbanco; R H Brook
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-07

5.  A health-related quality of life instrument for patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  B G Vickrey; R D Hays; J Graber; R Rausch; J Engel; R H Brook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Monitoring dialysis patients' health status.

Authors:  K B Meyer; D M Espindle; J M DeGiacomo; C S Jenuleson; P S Kurtin; A R Davies
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Development of the quality of life in epilepsy inventory.

Authors:  O Devinsky; B G Vickrey; J Cramer; K Perrine; B Hermann; K Meador; R D Hays
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Physicians' assessment of functional health status and well-being. The patient's perspective.

Authors:  E L Schor; D J Lerner; S Malspeis
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-02-13

9.  Physician recognition of behavioral, psychological, and social aspects of medical care.

Authors:  D S Brody
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1980-10

10.  Failure of physicians to recognize functional disability in ambulatory patients.

Authors:  D R Calkins; L V Rubenstein; P D Cleary; A R Davies; A M Jette; A Fink; J Kosecoff; R T Young; R H Brook; T L Delbanco
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  23 in total

1.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

Authors:  A Bezjak; P Ng; R Skeel; A D Depetrillo; R Comis; K M Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Using the health utilities index in routine clinical care: process, feasibility, and acceptability: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maria-Jose Santana; David H Feeny
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials.

Authors:  Simon J Griffin; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Marijcke W M Veltman; Susan Gillard; Julie Grant; Moira Stewart
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  The prognostic value of pre-diagnosis health-related quality of life on survival: a prospective cohort study of older Americans with lung cancer.

Authors:  Laura C Pinheiro; Timothy M Zagar; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Health related quality of life and health status in adult survivors with previously operated complex congenital heart disease.

Authors:  M Kamphuis; J Ottenkamp; H W Vliegen; T Vogels; K H Zwinderman; R P Kamphuis; S P Verloove-Vanhorick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  The clinical utility of health-related quality of life screening in a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease clinic.

Authors:  Jamie L Ryan; Michael W Mellon; Katherine W F Junger; Elizabeth A Hente; Lee A Denson; Shehzad A Saeed; Kevin A Hommel
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.325

7.  Provider perceptions of the value of same-day, electronic patient-reported measures for use in clinical HIV care.

Authors:  R J Fredericksen; J Tufano; J Ralston; J McReynolds; M Stewart; W B Lober; K H Mayer; W C Mathews; M J Mugavero; P K Crane; H M Crane
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2016-05-29

8.  The effect of feedback regarding coping strategies and illness behavior on hand surgery patient satisfaction and communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jos J Mellema; Casey M O'Connor; Celeste L Overbeek; Michiel G Hageman; David Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-09

9.  Logistic feasibility of health related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: results of a prospective study in a large population of chronic liver patients.

Authors:  Jolie J Gutteling; Jan J V Busschbach; Robert A de Man; Anne-Sophie E Darlington
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology.

Authors:  G Velikova; J M Brown; A B Smith; P J Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.