Literature DB >> 1593914

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

J E Ware1, C D Sherbourne.   

Abstract

A 36-item short-form (SF-36) was constructed to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys. The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. The survey was constructed for self-administration by persons 14 years of age and older, and for administration by a trained interviewer in person or by telephone. The history of the development of the SF-36, the origin of specific items, and the logic underlying their selection are summarized. The content and features of the SF-36 are compared with the 20-item Medical Outcomes Study short-form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1593914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  2000 in total

1.  Contrasting evidence of the effectiveness of cosmetic surgery from two health related quality of life measures.

Authors:  A Klassen; R Fitzpatrick; C Jenkinson; T Goodacre
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Asthma outcome measures.

Authors:  K D Watkins
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Clustering and the design of preference-assessment surveys in healthcare.

Authors:  A Lin; L A Lenert; M A Hlatky; K M McDonald; R A Olshen; J Hornberger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it?

Authors:  R D Hays; J M Woolley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Heritability of self-reported health.

Authors:  J C Romeis; J F Scherrer; H Xian; S A Eisen; K Bucholz; A C Heath; J Goldberg; M J Lyons; W G Henderson; W R True
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  A review of health-related quality-of-life measures in stroke.

Authors:  B A Golomb; B G Vickrey; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Recruiting African Americans into research on cognitive aging.

Authors:  G J McDougall; E C Holston; P Wilke
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.847

8.  Outcome trajectories for assisted living and nursing facility residents in Oregon.

Authors:  J R Frytak; R A Kane; M D Finch; R L Kane; R Maude-Griffin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The SF-36 as a health status measure for epilepsy: a psychometric assessment.

Authors:  A Jacoby; G A Baker; N Steen; D Buck
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.