BACKGROUND: The repeatability of 24-hour automatic ambulatory blood pressure measurements recorded by noninvasive equipment (Del Mar Pressurometer IV) was assessed to determine the intrapatient variability of this test. METHODS: The usual antihypertensive medications of 73 patients with documented essential hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 119 mm Hg) were withdrawn, and the patients were treated with placebo medication for 6 weeks. At the end of the placebo period, ambulatory blood pressure measurements of each patient were recorded every 15 minutes for 24 hours on two separate occasions 1 week apart. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in either the 24-hour systolic or diastolic blood pressure for the entire group between weeks. A mean difference for individual patients between the first and second recording within 5 mm Hg was observed in 49.3% and 52.1% of patients for 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. The correlation coefficient for 24-hour systolic blood pressure was greater than 24-hour diastolic blood pressure (r = .87 vs r = .67). A difference greater than 18.1/14.9 mm Hg for systolic/diastolic blood pressure would be required to assign a significant (P less than .05) change in blood pressure between two recordings in the same patient. CONCLUSIONS: These data quantify the usefulness of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements for a group of subjects. However, mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure varies significantly for individuals. Intrapatient variability may limit the usefulness of a single 24-hour ambulatory recording for an individual patient and suggests the need for more than one measurement to establish a level of blood pressure.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The repeatability of 24-hour automatic ambulatory blood pressure measurements recorded by noninvasive equipment (Del Mar Pressurometer IV) was assessed to determine the intrapatient variability of this test. METHODS: The usual antihypertensive medications of 73 patients with documented essential hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 119 mm Hg) were withdrawn, and the patients were treated with placebo medication for 6 weeks. At the end of the placebo period, ambulatory blood pressure measurements of each patient were recorded every 15 minutes for 24 hours on two separate occasions 1 week apart. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in either the 24-hour systolic or diastolic blood pressure for the entire group between weeks. A mean difference for individual patients between the first and second recording within 5 mm Hg was observed in 49.3% and 52.1% of patients for 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. The correlation coefficient for 24-hour systolic blood pressure was greater than 24-hour diastolic blood pressure (r = .87 vs r = .67). A difference greater than 18.1/14.9 mm Hg for systolic/diastolic blood pressure would be required to assign a significant (P less than .05) change in blood pressure between two recordings in the same patient. CONCLUSIONS: These data quantify the usefulness of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements for a group of subjects. However, mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure varies significantly for individuals. Intrapatient variability may limit the usefulness of a single 24-hour ambulatory recording for an individual patient and suggests the need for more than one measurement to establish a level of blood pressure.