Literature DB >> 22273167

Using the health utilities index in routine clinical care: process, feasibility, and acceptability: a randomized controlled trial.

Maria-Jose Santana1, David H Feeny.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: : Using measures of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in routine clinical practice has the potential to improve the quality of healthcare and outcomes. The Health Utilities Index (HUI) is a generic, preference-based measure of HR-QOL. The aim of this study was to describe the process, feasibility and acceptability of use of the HUI in routine clinical care.
METHODS: : The study was conducted at the outpatient Heart and Lung Transplant Clinic, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Before seeing the clinician, patients attending the clinic completed the HUI on a touch-screen computer at each visit. This information was graphically represented on the HUI score card and presented to the clinicians during the visit. Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline and at the end of the study. Training in the interpretation of the results was provided on a regular basis to the clinicians. The use of HUI in clinical practice was assessed from the perspectives of clinicians and patients. Clinicians completed two questionnaires, at baseline (on expectations) and at the end of the study (an evaluation), regarding the usefulness of the HUI measure in routine clinical care. Patients completed an evaluation form at the end of the study.
RESULTS: : Of 151 patients, 135 were happy to use the touch-screen computer and 138 patients confirmed that the questionnaire was easy to complete. Only 10 of 151 patients were unwilling to complete the questionnaires. Clinicians agreed that the results from the HUI helped to improve patient-clinician communication. Members of the team indicated that the HUI score card was clinically relevant and confirmed their diagnoses.
CONCLUSIONS: : Patients quickly learned how to complete the HUI questionnaire on the computer. Clinicians found that the information provided was valuable and have subsequently incorporated the use of the HUI in the routine clinical care of their patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22273167     DOI: 10.2165/11313620-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  12 in total

Review 1.  Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact.

Authors:  M Espallargues; J M Valderas; J Alonso
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.

Authors:  David Feeny; William Furlong; George W Torrance; Charles H Goldsmith; Zenglong Zhu; Sonja DePauw; Margaret Denton; Michael Boyle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients.

Authors:  P Taenzer; B D Bultz; L E Carlson; M Speca; T DeGagne; K Olson; R Doll; Z Rosberger
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Patient-based health status measurement in clinical practice: a study of its impact on epilepsy patients' care.

Authors:  A K Wagner; B L Ehrenberg; T A Tran; K M Bungay; D J Cynn; W H Rogers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires.

Authors:  G Velikova; E P Wright; A B Smith; A Cull; A Gould; D Forman; T Perren; M Stead; J Brown; P J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jaya K Rao; Lynda A Anderson; Thomas S Inui; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings.

Authors:  E Nelson; J Wasson; J Kirk; A Keller; D Clark; A Dietrich; A Stewart; M Zubkoff
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

10.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  13 in total

1.  The prognostic value of pre-diagnosis health-related quality of life on survival: a prospective cohort study of older Americans with lung cancer.

Authors:  Laura C Pinheiro; Timothy M Zagar; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Multiple sclerosis in Canada 2011 to 2031: results of a microsimulation modelling study of epidemiological and economic impacts.

Authors:  Nana Amankwah; Ruth Ann Marrie; Christina Bancej; Rochelle Garner; Douglas G Manuel; Ron Wall; Philippe Finès; Julie Bernier; Karen Tu; Kim Reimer
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients.

Authors:  Maria-Jose Santana; David Feeny; Jeffrey A Johnson; Finlay A McAlister; Daniel Kim; Justin Weinkauf; Dale C Lien
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Cerebral palsy in Canada, 2011-2031: results of a microsimulation modelling study of epidemiological and cost impacts.

Authors:  Nana Amankwah; Maryam Oskoui; Rochelle Garner; Christina Bancej; Douglas G Manuel; Ron Wall; Philippe Finès; Julie Bernier; Karen Tu; Kim Reimer
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Maria J Santana; Lotte Haverman; Kate Absolom; Elena Takeuchi; David Feeny; Martha Grootenhuis; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Alzheimer's and other dementias in Canada, 2011 to 2031: a microsimulation Population Health Modeling (POHEM) study of projected prevalence, health burden, health services, and caregiving use.

Authors:  Douglas G Manuel; Rochelle Garner; Philippe Finès; Christina Bancej; William Flanagan; Karen Tu; Kim Reimer; Larry W Chambers; Julie Bernier
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2016-11-03

8.  Evaluation of an alternative care provider clinic for severe sleep-disordered breathing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ada Ip-Buting; Jenny Kelly; Maria J Santana; Erika D Penz; W Ward Flemons; Willis H Tsai; Kristin L Fraser; Patrick J Hanly; Sachin R Pendharkar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung-heart transplant patients.

Authors:  Maria J Santana; David Feeny; Justin Weinkauf; Roland Nador; Ali Kapasi; Kathleen Jackson; Marianne Schafenacker; Dalyce Zuk; Dale Lien
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2010-09-03

Review 10.  How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework.

Authors:  Maria J Santana; Kimberly Manalili; Rachel J Jolley; Sandra Zelinsky; Hude Quan; Mingshan Lu
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.