Literature DB >> 7832603

Physicians' assessment of functional health status and well-being. The patient's perspective.

E L Schor1, D J Lerner, S Malspeis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ascribing quality to medical care rests in part on the expectation of physician behavior and the content of care. The adoption of functional outcomes of care as legitimate measures of quality will require greater attention to patient-provided assessments of health and add new dimensions to medical practice and quality assessment.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, national population survey of adults to obtain estimates of the frequency with which physicians reportedly inquire about patients' functional health status and emotional well-being, patients' attitudes about such assessments, and the perceived use of data thus obtained in the therapeutic process.
RESULTS: The majority of physicians rarely or never ask about the extent to which patients' health limits their ability to perform everyday activities (64.7% to 78.7%); neither do they inquire about limitations imposed by emotional problems (71.4% to 84.4%). Physicians are more likely to make such inquiries in the presence of chronic illness or diminished health status, or with older patients, although such assessments remain the exception to usual practice and a large portion of functional impairment is undiscovered. More than 60% of respondents want their physicians to assess their functional health status and well-being.
CONCLUSIONS: While individuals want their physicians to assess their functional performance and emotional well-being as a part of medical care, by their reports this occurs infrequently. The content of care may be less comprehensive than physicians believe to be the case.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Mental Health Therapies; National Opinion Research Center (University of Chicago); Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7832603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  18 in total

1.  Making Function Part of the Conversation: Clinician Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

Authors:  Francesca M Nicosia; Malena J Spar; Michael A Steinman; Sei J Lee; Rebecca T Brown
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Quality of life assessment by community pharmacists: an exploratory study.

Authors:  J P Bentley; M C Smith; B F Banahan; D A Frate; B R Parks
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Using the biopsychosocial model in practice. Improving the care of patients with late-life depression.

Authors:  K E Covinsky; C S Landefeld
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Health related quality of life and health status in adult survivors with previously operated complex congenital heart disease.

Authors:  M Kamphuis; J Ottenkamp; H W Vliegen; T Vogels; K H Zwinderman; R P Kamphuis; S P Verloove-Vanhorick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Patient-based health status measurement in clinical practice: a study of its impact on epilepsy patients' care.

Authors:  A K Wagner; B L Ehrenberg; T A Tran; K M Bungay; D J Cynn; W H Rogers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

Authors:  C A McHorney; A R Tarlov
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  "The More They Know, the Better Care They Can Give": Patient Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

Authors:  Francesca M Nicosia; Malena J Spar; Alicia Neumann; Molly C Silvestrini; Maureen Barrientos; Rebecca T Brown
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  [Patient reported outcomes. Relevance and application in ophthalmology].

Authors:  R P Finger; H P N Scholl; F G Holz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Patient-reported outcomes in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Christopher H Goss; Alexandra L Quittner
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2007-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.