Literature DB >> 11508471

Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

A Bezjak1, P Ng, R Skeel, A D Depetrillo, R Comis, K M Taylor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Objectives of this study were to obtain data from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) oncologists regarding their views on quality of life (QOL) information; perform psychometric testing on the MD-QOL questionnaire, develop a model to describe oncologists' willingness to use QOL information and propose data-based interventions to facilitate use of QOL information in clinical decision-making.
METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire, MD-QOL, designed to assess physician perspective on QOL information was mailed to a random sample of 500 oncologists, members of ECOG; 271 responded.
RESULTS: Oncologists' attitude, current behaviour, knowledge of QOL data, and reported willingness to use QOL can be measured using MD-QOL. The attitude, behaviour and willingness scales have high internal consistency. Physician attitude and behaviour account for 59% of the variance in the willingness to use QOL information. Demographic variables influencing physician responses were their primary income source and exposure to trials with a QOL component.
CONCLUSIONS: This report of ECOG oncologists' views on QOL information suggests a model to describe relationship between physician willingness to use QOL information on the basis of their attitude and behaviour. Data-based interventions are proposed to influence the key variables and thus facilitate the incorporation of QOL data in clinical practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508471     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016692804023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  43 in total

Review 1.  The use of QALYs in health care decision making.

Authors:  G Loomes; L McKenzie
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Quality of life research in oncology. Past achievements and future priorities.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; B E Meyerowitz; M Bard; J R Bloom; F I Fawzy; M Feldstein; D Fink; J C Holland; J E Johnson; J T Lowman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Morris; D Perez; B McNoe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Computerized quality-of-life screening in an oncology clinic.

Authors:  P A Taenzer; M Speca; M J Atkinson; B D Bultz; S Page; P Harasym; J L Davis
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  1997 May-Jun

5.  Measuring cancer patients' quality of life. A look at physician attitudes.

Authors:  D L Walsh; L J Emrich
Journal:  N Y State J Med       Date:  1988-07

6.  Interpreting quality-of-life clinical trial data for use in the clinical practice of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  M A Testa
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1987-02

Review 7.  Smoking cessation: recent developments in behavioral and pharmacologic interventions.

Authors:  P M Cinciripini; J B McClure
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study.

Authors:  S B Detmar; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  What do Italian hospital physicians know about quality of life assessment in oncology?

Authors:  G Belli; M Tamburini; E Paci
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1994-02-28
View more
  28 in total

1.  Participation of patients in decisions about treatment for cancer.

Authors:  L Fallowfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-17

Review 2.  Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers.

Authors:  Michael Brundage; Brenda Bass; Judith Davidson; John Queenan; Andrea Bezjak; Jolie Ringash; Anna Wilkinson; Deb Feldman-Stewart
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Continence specialists use of quality of life information in routine practice: a national survey of practitioners.

Authors:  Kirstie L Haywood; Andrew M Garratt; Sandra Carrivick; Joanne Mangnall; Suzanne M Skevington
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples.

Authors:  Matthias Rose; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Quality of life in the trastuzumab for gastric cancer trial.

Authors:  Taroh Satoh; Yung-Jue Bang; Evgeny A Gotovkin; Yasuo Hamamoto; Yoon-Koo Kang; Vladimir M Moiseyenko; Atsushi Ohtsu; Eric Van Cutsem; Nedal Al-Sakaff; Alexa Urspruch; Julie Hill; Harald A Weber; Hyun-Cheol Chung
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-06-20

6.  A knowledge translation challenge: clinical use of quality of life data from cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael Brundage; Brenda Bass; Ringash Jolie; Kimberley Foley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Picture This: Presenting Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Research Study Results to Patients.

Authors:  Elliott Tolbert; Michael Brundage; Elissa Bantug; Amanda L Blackford; Katherine Smith; Claire Snyder
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  In proportion: approaches for displaying patient-reported outcome research study results as percentages responding to treatment.

Authors:  Elliott Tolbert; Michael Brundage; Elissa Bantug; Amanda L Blackford; Katherine Smith; Claire Snyder
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Exploration of oncologists' attitudes toward and perceived value of patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Michael L Meldahl; Sarah Acaster; Risa P Hayes
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Physicians' knowledge of health-related quality of life and perception of its importance in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Maurizio Bossola; Rita Murri; Graziano Onder; Adriana Turriziani; Massimo Fantoni; Luca Padua
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.