Literature DB >> 9170052

MRI acoustic noise: sound pressure and frequency analysis.

S A Counter1, A Olofsson, H F Grahn, E Borg.   

Abstract

The large gradient coils used in MRI generate, simultaneously with the pulsed radiofrequency (RF) wave, acoustic noise of high intensity that has raised concern regarding hearing safety. The sound pressure levels (SPLs) and power spectra of MRI acoustic noise were measured at the position of the human head in the isocenter of five MRI systems and with 10 different pulse sequences used in clinical MR scanning. Each protocol, including magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE; 113 dB SPL linear), fast gradient echo turbo (114 dB SPL linear), and spin echo T1/2 mm (117 dB SPL linear), was found to have the high SPLs, rapid pulse rates, amplitude-modulated pulse envelopes, and multipeaked spectra. Since thickness and SPL were inversely related, the T1-weighted images generated more intense acoustic noise than the proton-dense T2-weighted measures. The unfiltered linear peak values provided more accurate measurements of the SPL and spectral content of the MRI acoustic noise than the commonly used dB A-weighted scale, which filters out the predominant low frequency components. Fourier analysis revealed predominantly low frequency energy peaks ranging from .05 to approximately 1 kHz, with a steep high frequency cutoff for each pulse sequence. Ear protectors of known attenuation ratings are recommended for all patients during MRI testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9170052     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  23 in total

1.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic-resonance-related acoustic noise levels.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Piotr A Wielopolski; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI.

Authors:  Carrie J Scarff; Joseph C Dort; Jos J Eggermont; Bradley G Goodyear
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Characterization of vibration and acoustic noise in a gradient-coil insert.

Authors:  G Z Yao; C K Mechefske; B K Rutt
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  A comprehensive experimental study of micro-perforated panel acoustic absorbers in MRI scanners.

Authors:  Gemin Li; Chris K Mechefske
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Compensation of gradient-induced magnetic field perturbations.

Authors:  Terence W Nixon; Scott McIntyre; Douglas L Rothman; Robin A de Graaf
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Silent echo-planar imaging for auditory FMRI.

Authors:  S Schmitter; E Diesch; M Amann; A Kroll; M Moayer; L R Schad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise.

Authors:  T M Talavage; W B Edmister; P J Ledden; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.