Literature DB >> 20464444

A comprehensive experimental study of micro-perforated panel acoustic absorbers in MRI scanners.

Gemin Li1, Chris K Mechefske.   

Abstract

OBJECT: A comprehensive experimental study has been conducted to investigate the possibilities of using micro-perforated panel (MPP) acoustic absorbers in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: The experimental acoustic measurements include measurements in an impedance tube, measurements in an MRI scanner bore mock-up, and in situ measurements in an actual MRI scanner.
RESULTS: The experimental results are in good agreement with theoretical calculations. This study confirms that MPP acoustic absorbers have multiple absorption frequency bands and wider frequency bands at higher frequency ranges when they are used in cylindrically shaped ducts such as MRI scanner bores. It has also been found that the acoustic noise level in the scanner bore is significantly increased when the air gap depth behind the MPP is too large.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that an MPP absorber, when properly designed, is effective in reducing the acoustic noise in MRI scanners. And, when designing an MPP absorber for MRI scanners, the air gap depth should be carefully considered.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20464444     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-010-0216-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  9 in total

1.  Active acoustic control in gradient coils for MRI.

Authors:  P Mansfield; B Haywood; R Coxon
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Quiet transverse gradient coils: Lorentz force balanced designs using geometrical similitude.

Authors:  R W Bowtell; P Mansfield
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Effects of the acoustic noise of the gradient systems on fMRI: a study on auditory, motor, and visual cortices.

Authors:  Z H Cho; S C Chung; D W Lim; E K Wong
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  The use of active noise control (ANC) to reduce acoustic noise generated during MRI scanning: some initial results.

Authors:  M McJury; R W Stewart; D Crawford; E Toma
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging.

Authors:  M E Quirk; A J Letendre; R A Ciottone; J F Lingley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  MRI acoustic noise: sound pressure and frequency analysis.

Authors:  S A Counter; A Olofsson; H F Grahn; E Borg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging.

Authors:  R Hurwitz; S R Lane; R A Bell; M N Brant-Zawadzki
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Active acoustic screening: reduction of noise in gradient coils by Lorentz force balancing.

Authors:  P Mansfield; B L Chapman; R Bowtell; P Glover; R Coxon; P R Harvey
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  MRI gradient coil cylinder sound field simulation and measurement.

Authors:  Chris K Mechefske; Yuhua Wu; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.097

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Gradient and shim technologies for ultra high field MRI.

Authors:  Simone A Winkler; Franz Schmitt; Hermann Landes; Joshua de Bever; Trevor Wade; Andrew Alejski; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Neuroimaging paradigms for tonotopic mapping (II): the influence of acquisition protocol.

Authors:  Dave R M Langers; Rosa M Sanchez-Panchuelo; Susan T Francis; Katrin Krumbholz; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.