Literature DB >> 18329304

Compensation of gradient-induced magnetic field perturbations.

Terence W Nixon1, Scott McIntyre, Douglas L Rothman, Robin A de Graaf.   

Abstract

Pulsed magnetic field gradients are essential for MR imaging and localized spectroscopy applications. However, besides the desired linear field gradients, pulsed currents in a strong external magnetic field also generate unwanted effects like eddy currents, gradient coil vibrations and acoustic noise. While the temporal magnetic field perturbations associated with eddy currents lead to spectral line shape distortions and signal loss, the vibration-related modulations lead to anti-symmetrical sidebands of any large signal (i.e. water), thereby obliterating the signals from low-concentration metabolites. Here the measurement, characterization and compensation of vibration-related magnetic field perturbations is presented. Following a quantitative evaluation of the various temporal components of the main magnetic field, a digital B0 magnetic field waveform is generated which reduces all temporal variations of the main magnetic field to within the spectral noise level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18329304      PMCID: PMC2485241          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  16 in total

1.  Gradient-induced acoustic and magnetic field fluctuations in a 4T whole-body MR imager.

Authors:  Y Wu; B A Chronik; C Bowen; C K Mechefske; B K Rutt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Principles of active acoustic control in gradient coil design.

Authors:  P Mansfield; B Haywood
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  The return of the frequency sweep: designing adiabatic pulses for contemporary NMR.

Authors:  M Garwood; L DelaBarre
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  1H spectroscopy without solvent suppression: characterization of signal modulations at short echo times.

Authors:  D B Clayton; M A Elliott; J S Leigh; R E Lenkinski
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.

Authors:  D L Price; J P De Wilde; A M Papadaki; J S Curran; R I Kitney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Proton MR spectroscopic imaging without water suppression.

Authors:  J W van Der Veen; D R Weinberger; G Tedeschi; J A Frank; J H Duyn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  New method for the simultaneous detection of metabolites and water in localized in vivo 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Wolfgang Dreher; Dieter Leibfritz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging.

Authors:  P Jezzard; A S Barnett; C Pierpaoli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  MRI acoustic noise: sound pressure and frequency analysis.

Authors:  S A Counter; A Olofsson; H F Grahn; E Borg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Model gradient coil employing active acoustic control for MRI.

Authors:  B Haywood; B Chapman; P Mansfield
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  6 in total

1.  FID modulus: a simple and efficient technique to phase and align MR spectra.

Authors:  Yann Le Fur; Patrick J Cozzone
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Proton CSI without solvent suppression with strongly reduced field gradient related sideband artifacts.

Authors:  Grzegorz L Chadzynski; Uwe Klose
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  On the accurate analysis of vibroacoustics in head insert gradient coils.

Authors:  Simone A Winkler; Andrew Alejski; Trevor Wade; Charles A McKenzie; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Addressing phase errors in fat-water imaging using a mixed magnitude/complex fitting method.

Authors:  D Hernando; C D G Hines; H Yu; S B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Authors:  Marjan Biria; Lucia-Manuela Cantonas; Paula Banca
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021

6.  Dynamic B0 shimming at 7 T.

Authors:  Saikat Sengupta; E Brian Welch; Yansong Zhao; David Foxall; Piotr Starewicz; Adam W Anderson; John C Gore; Malcolm J Avison
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 2.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.