Literature DB >> 9156212

M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution.

H A Baseler1, E E Sutter.   

Abstract

To study components related to parallel processing of information across the visual field, multi-focal pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded using binary m-sequences. Contrast, chromatic, spatial and temporal characteristics of the stimuli were varied in order to favor contributions from either M or P pathways. Responses were decomposed into two additive components whose behavior was consistent with that of M and P mechanisms. The results suggest that contributions to the VEP from the M pathway precede those from the P pathway, and that the ratio of P/M contributions decreases with eccentricity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9156212     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00209-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  42 in total

1.  Topography of the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  W A Verdon; G Haegerstrom-Portnoy
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Topography of the chromatic pattern-onset VEP.

Authors:  Christina Gerth; Peter B Delahunt; Michael A Crognale; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chandra Balachandran; Alexander I Klistorner; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.

Authors:  Samuel A Inverso; Xin-Lin Goh; Linda Henriksson; Simo Vanni; Andrew C James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Pattern electroretinogram and psychophysical tests of visual function for discriminating between healthy and glaucoma eyes.

Authors:  Ali Tafreshi; Lyne Racette; Robert N Weinreb; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Increasing the sensitivity of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique: incorporating information from higher order kernels using a principal component analysis method.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The effect of fixation instability on the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  Michael Menz; Erich Sutter; Momoyo Menz
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Multifocal VEP difference between early- and late-onset strabismus amblyopia.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Kanxing Zhao
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Mar-May       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Methods for quantifying intra- and inter-subject variability of evoked potential data applied to the multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Sangita Dandekar; Justin Ales; Thom Carney; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  The folding fingerprint of visual cortex reveals the timing of human V1 and V2.

Authors:  Justin Ales; Thom Carney; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.