Literature DB >> 15573945

Increasing the sensitivity of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique: incorporating information from higher order kernels using a principal component analysis method.

Xian Zhang1, Donald C Hood.   

Abstract

Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to enhance the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique. First, by using four principal components, the separation of mfVEP signals from noises was improved. Second, two otherwise unused higher order kernels, the 2nd slice of the 2nd order kernel and the 4th order kernels, were utilized by combining information obtained from the PCA. The PCA-kernel method improves the efficiency of the mfVEP test. The false positive rate, based upon an analysis of a noise window, was decreased by a factor of about one-third and the improvement in sensitivity of detecting glaucomatous defects was nearly as good as a doubling of the recording time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15573945     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-004-5323-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  19 in total

1.  Imaging visual function with the multifocal m-sequence technique.

Authors:  E E Sutter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes.

Authors:  D C Hood; X Zhang
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 3.  Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Candice S Chen; Jenny E Hong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Andrew Charles James
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.

Authors:  Ivan Goldberg; Stuart L Graham; Alexander I Klistorner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects.

Authors:  A I Klistorner; S L Graham; J R Grigg; F A Billson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence of a linear relationship.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Vivienne C Greenstein; Jeffrey G Odel; Xian Zhang; Robert Ritch; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Jenny E Hong; Candice S Chen; Phamornsak Thienprasiddhi
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-12

9.  Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: a multifocal VEP study.

Authors:  D C Hood; J G Odel; X Zhang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: how can a monocular test work?

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Bryan J Winn
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  5 in total

1.  Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Nitin Ohri; E Bo Yang; Christopher Rodarte; Xian Zhang; Brad Fortune; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Methods for quantifying intra- and inter-subject variability of evoked potential data applied to the multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Sangita Dandekar; Justin Ales; Thom Carney; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Multifocal visual evoked potential and automated perimetry abnormalities in strabismic amblyopes.

Authors:  Vivienne C Greenstein; Howard M Eggers; Donald C Hood
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  A method to detect progression of glaucoma using the multifocal visual evoked potential technique.

Authors:  Boonchai Wangsupadilok; Vivienne C Greenstein; Fabio N Kanadani; Tomas M Grippo; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  A computer-aided diagnosis of multiple sclerosis based on mfVEP recordings.

Authors:  Luis de Santiago; E M Sánchez Morla; Miguel Ortiz; Elena López; Carlos Amo Usanos; M C Alonso-Rodríguez; R Barea; Carlo Cavaliere-Ballesta; Alfredo Fernández; Luciano Boquete
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.