Literature DB >> 12678283

Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Chandra Balachandran1, Alexander I Klistorner, Stuart L Graham.   

Abstract

In this study we examined the effects of varying stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potential (VEP). We also evaluated the currently used cortical scaling of stimulus segments. The ObjectiVision multifocal objective perimeter stimulates the eye with random check patterns at 56 cortically scaled segments within the visual field extending to a radius of 26 degrees. All cortically scaled segments have equal number of checks, which gradually increase in size from the center to the periphery, proportional to the size of the segment. Stimuli with 9, 16, 25, 36 and 49 checks/segment were tested on 10 eyes belonging to 10 normal subjects. The check size varied inversely with number of checks per segment. VEP was recorded using bipolar occipital cross electrodes (7 min/eye), the amplitude and latency of responses obtained were compared with the check size at different eccentricities. Our findings suggest that the existing setting with 16 checks/segment subtending 26' to 140' from center to periphery, is the most effective amongst all the check sizes. Decreasing the check size prolongs the latency in the central field only. Cortical scaling of segments generates responses of the same order of magnitude throughout the field, but could be improved slightly to enhance the signal from the outer two rings.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12678283     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022571530152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  19 in total

1.  Objective perimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  A Klistorner; S L Graham
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.

Authors:  Ivan Goldberg; Stuart L Graham; Alexander I Klistorner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Miniature fiber-optic pattern-reversal stimulator for determination of the visual evoked potential threshold; comparison with Snellen acuity.

Authors:  Y Raniel; H Pratt; E Neumann; S E Schacham
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Effect of number of elements and size of stimulus field on recordability of pattern reversal visual evoked response.

Authors:  O Katsumi; T Hirose; T Tsukada
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check-size as a function of retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  M R Harter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Effects of spatially structured stimulus fields on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  D Ristanović; R Hajduković
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-06

7.  An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

Authors:  T C Jenkins; W A Douthwaite
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1988-12

8.  Effect of hemifield stimulation on simultaneous steady-state pattern reversal electroretinogram and visual evoked response.

Authors:  O Katsumi; S Tetsuka; M C Mehta; H Tetsuka; T Hirose
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  J T Meredith; G G Celesia
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-03

10.  Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability.

Authors:  A I Klistorner; S L Graham
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  6 in total

1.  Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Nitin Ohri; E Bo Yang; Christopher Rodarte; Xian Zhang; Brad Fortune; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The effects of glaucoma on the latency of the multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  S L Graham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Correlation between full-field and multifocal VEPs in optic neuritis.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; Clare Fraser; Raymond Garrick; Stuart Graham; Hemamalini Arvind
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential (mfVEP) and Pattern-Reversal Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Patients with Visual Pathway Disorders: A Case Series.

Authors:  Daniah Alshowaeir; Con Yiannikas; Alexander Klistorner
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2015-08-25

Review 5.  A Comprehensive Review on Methodologies Employed for Visual Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Ruchi Kothari; Pradeep Bokariya; Smita Singh; Ramji Singh
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-02-29

6.  Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Junwon Jang; Sungeun E Kyung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.209

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.