Literature DB >> 8807316

Comparing mutational variabilities.

D Houle1, B Morikawa, M Lynch.   

Abstract

We have reviewed the available data on VM, the amount of genetic variation in phenotypic traits produced each generation by mutation. We use these data to make several qualitative tests of the mutation-selection balance hypothesis for the maintenance of genetic variance (MSB). To compare VM values, we use three dimensionless quantities: mutational heritability, VM/VE, the mutational coefficient of variation, CVM; and the ratio of the standing genetic variance to VM, VC/VM. Since genetic coefficients of variation for life history traits are larger than those for morphological traits, we predict that under MSB, life history traits should also have larger CVM. This is confirmed; life history traits have a median CVM value more than six times higher than that for morphological traits. VC/VM approximates the persistence time of mutations under MSB in an infinite population. In order for MSB to hold, VC/VM must be small, substantially less than 1000, and life history traits should have smaller values than morphological traits. VC/VM averages about 50 generations for life history traits and 100 generations for morphological traits. These observations are all consistent with the predictions of a mutation-selection balance model.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8807316      PMCID: PMC1207413     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  38 in total

1.  Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mixed model analysis of a selection experiment for food intake in mice.

Authors:  K Meyer; W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Mutations Affecting Quantitative Traits in the Selfed Progeny of Doubled Monoploid Maize Stocks.

Authors:  G F Sprague; W A Russell; L H Penny
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  D A Roff; T A Mousseau
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Replicated selection for body weight in mice.

Authors:  D S Falconer
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 6.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of mutant effects on the trait and fitness.

Authors:  M A López; C López-Fanjul
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: estimates from response to selection of inbred strains.

Authors:  T F Mackay; J D Fry; R F Lyman; S V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; E Beecham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  114 in total

1.  Estimation of parameters of deleterious mutations in partial selfing or partial outcrossing populations and in nonequilibrium populations.

Authors:  J Li; H W Deng
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mild environmental stress elicits mutations affecting fitness in Chlamydomonas.

Authors:  S Goho; G Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Whole-genome effects of ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutation on nine quantitative traits in outbred Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  H P Yang; A Y Tanikawa; W A Van Voorhies; J C Silva; A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Pleiotropic model of maintenance of quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Nonequivalent Loci and the distribution of mutant effects.

Authors:  J J Welch; D Waxman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Deleterious mutations and the genetic variance of male fitness components in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genotype-environment interactions of spontaneous mutations for vegetative fitness in the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Jianping Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Additivity and trans-acting effects on gene expression in male Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  M L Wayne; Y-J Pan; S V Nuzhdin; L M McIntyre
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetic regulatory network motifs constrain adaptation through curvature in the landscape of mutational (co)variance.

Authors:  Tyler D Hether; Paul A Hohenlohe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.