Literature DB >> 25572964

Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.

Brian Charlesworth1.   

Abstract

DNA sequencing has revealed high levels of variability within most species. Statistical methods based on population genetics theory have been applied to the resulting data and suggest that most mutations affecting functionally important sequences are deleterious but subject to very weak selection. Quantitative genetic studies have provided information on the extent of genetic variation within populations in traits related to fitness and the rate at which variability in these traits arises by mutation. This paper attempts to combine the available information from applications of the two approaches to populations of the fruitfly Drosophila in order to estimate some important parameters of genetic variation, using a simple population genetics model of mutational effects on fitness components. Analyses based on this model suggest the existence of a class of mutations with much larger fitness effects than those inferred from sequence variability and that contribute most of the standing variation in fitness within a population caused by the input of mildly deleterious mutations. However, deleterious mutations explain only part of this standing variation, and other processes such as balancing selection appear to make a large contribution to genetic variation in fitness components in Drosophila.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; genetic variability; mutation; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25572964      PMCID: PMC4330759          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423275112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  80 in total

Review 1.  Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Deleterious mutations and genetic variation for flower size in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  J K Kelly; J H Willis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Estimating the distribution of fitness effects from DNA sequence data: implications for the molecular clock.

Authors:  Gwenaël Piganeau; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION.

Authors:  M KIMURA; J F CROW
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A review of some fundamental concepts and problems of population genetics.

Authors:  T DOBZHANSKY
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

Review 7.  Analysis and implications of mutational variation.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Daniel L Halligan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  A reevaluation of data from competitive tests shows high levels of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J A Sved
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Kevin R Thornton; Brian Charlesworth; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  62 in total

1.  Naturally segregating loci exhibit epistasis for fitness.

Authors:  Patrick J Monnahan; John K Kelly
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  A genomic perspective on the generation and maintenance of genetic diversity in herbivorous insects.

Authors:  Andrew D Gloss; Simon C Groen; Noah K Whiteman
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 13.915

3.  Profile of Brian Charlesworth.

Authors:  Jennifer Viegas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evaluating the genetic architecture of quantitative traits via selection followed by inbreeding.

Authors:  Robert J Dugand; W Jason Kennington; Joseph L Tomkins
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  When Does Frequency-Independent Selection Maintain Genetic Variation?

Authors:  Sebastian Novak; Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Inferring Demographic History Using Two-Locus Statistics.

Authors:  Aaron P Ragsdale; Ryan N Gutenkunst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Fine-scale genetic structure due to adaptive divergence among microhabitats.

Authors:  D N Wagner; T Z Baris; D I Dayan; X Du; M F Oleksiak; D L Crawford
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Introgression of a Block of Genome Under Infinitesimal Selection.

Authors:  Himani Sachdeva; Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  An experimental test of the mutation-selection balance model for the maintenance of genetic variance in fitness components.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Local adaptation and the evolution of inversions on sex chromosomes and autosomes.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Colin Olito; Ludovic Dutoit; Homa Papoli; Filip Ruzicka; Lengxob Yong
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.