Literature DB >> 11886642

The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation.

Jonathan R Gibson1, Adam K Chippindale, William R Rice.   

Abstract

Sexually antagonistic alleles are selected discordantly between the sexes. Experimental evidence indicates that sexually antagonistic fitness variation is abundant in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Theory predicts that the X chromosome will be enriched with this type of variation. To test this prediction in D. melanogaster, we sampled, and cytogenetically cloned, 20 X chromosomes and compared their fitness variation to genome-wide levels. At the juvenile stage, in which gender roles are most similar, the X chromosome made no detectable contribution to genome-wide fitness variation. At the adult stage, in which gender roles diverge, the X chromosome was estimated to harbour 45% of the genome-wide fitness variation and 97% of the genome-wide sexually antagonistic variation. This genomic structure has important implications for the process of sexual selection because X-linked sexually antagonistic variation contributes to negative intersexual heritability for fitness, i.e. high-fitness males (females) produce, on average, low-fitness daughters (sons).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11886642      PMCID: PMC1690921          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  An abundance of X-linked genes expressed in spermatogonia.

Authors:  P J Wang; J R McCarrey; F Yang; D C Page
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system.

Authors:  M G Ritchie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sex-specific quantitative trait loci affecting longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S V Nuzhdin; E G Pasyukova; C L Dilda; Z B Zeng; T F Mackay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Male fitness increases when females are eliminated from gene pool: implications for the Y chromosome.

Authors:  W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Homozygous and Hemizygous Viability Variation on the X Chromosome of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  W F Eanes; J Hey; D Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Null allele frequencies at allozyme loci in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C H Langley; R A Voelker; A J Brown; S Ohnishi; B Dickson; E Montgomery
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic variation for total fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Fowler; C Semple; N H Barton; L Partridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila.

Authors:  E N Moriyama; J R Powell
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  97 in total

1.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic variation for total fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: complex yet replicable patterns.

Authors:  Michael P Gardner; Kevin Fowler; Nicholas H Barton; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Gene duplication, tissue-specific gene expression and sexual conflict in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae).

Authors:  Richard H Baker; Apurva Narechania; Philip M Johns; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Genetic basis of sexual dimorphism in the threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus.

Authors:  T Leinonen; J M Cano; J Merilä
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Transitions between male and female heterogamety caused by sex-antagonistic selection.

Authors:  G Sander van Doorn; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Stable linkage disequilibrium owing to sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Francisco Ubeda; David Haig; Manus M Patten
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Evolution of haploid selection in predominantly diploid organisms.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto; Michael F Scott; Simone Immler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Contrasting effects of intralocus sexual conflict on sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Freek J H de Haas; Edward H Morrow; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Assessing sexual conflict in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.

Authors:  William R Rice; Andrew D Stewart; Edward H Morrow; Jodell E Linder; Nicole Orteiza; Phillip G Byrne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.