Literature DB >> 9028772

Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil.

K Sakai1, Y Ugawa, Y Terao, R Hanajima, T Furubayashi, I Kanazawa.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the human primary motor cortex (MI) evokes motor responses in the contralateral limb muscles. The latencies and amplitudes of those responses depend on the direction of induced current in the brain by the stimuli (Mills et al. 1992, Werhahn et al. 1994). This observation suggests that different neural elements might be activated by the differently directed induced currents. Using a figure-of-eight-shaped coil, which induces current with a certain direction, we analyzed the effect of direction of stimulating current on the latencies of responses to TMS in normal subjects. The latencies were measured from surface electromyographic responses of the first dorsal interosseous muscles and the peaks in the peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of single motor units from the same muscles. The coil was placed over the MI, with eight different directions each separated by 45 degrees. Stimulus intensity was adjusted just above the motor threshold while subjects made a weak tonic voluntary contraction, so that we can analyse the most readily elicited descending volley in the pyramidal tracts. In most subjects, TMS with medially and anteriorly directed current in the brain produced responses or a peak that occurred some 1.5 ms later than those to anodal electrical stimulation. In contrast, TMS with laterally and posteriorly directed current produced responses or a peak that occurred about 4.5 ms later. There was a single peak in most of PSTHs under the above stimulation condition, whereas there were occasionally two peaks under the transitional current directions between the above two groups. These results suggest that TMS with medially and anteriorly directed current in the brain readily elicits I1 waves, whereas that with laterally and posteriorly directed current preferentially elicits I3 waves. Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies indicated that this direction was related to the course of the central sulcus. TMS with induced current flowing forward relative to the central sulcus preferentially elicited I1 waves and that flowing backward elicited I3 waves. Our finding of the dependence of preferentially activated I waves on the current direction in the brain suggests that different sets of cortical neurons are responsible for different I waves, and are contrarily oriented. The present method using a figure-of-eight-shaped coil must enable us to study physiological characteristics of each I wave separately and, possibly, analyse different neural elements in MI, since it activates a certain I wave selectively without D waves or other I waves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9028772     DOI: 10.1007/bf02454139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  A comparison of corticospinal activation by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation of monkey motor cortex.

Authors:  V E Amassian; G J Quirk; M Stewart
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

2.  Spatial distribution of the electric field induced in volume by round and figure '8' magnetic coils: relevance to activation of sensory nerve fibers.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; L Eberle; V E Amassian; R Q Cracco; A Rudell; M Jayachandra
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-08

3.  Finding the depth of magnetic brain stimulation: a re-evaluation.

Authors:  D Rudiak; E Marg
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-10

4.  Conduction pathways and generators of magnetic evoked spinal cord potentials: a study in monkeys.

Authors:  H Kitagawa; A R Møller
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-02

5.  Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; J P Dick; J M Cowan; A Berardelli; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current.

Authors:  S D Stoney; W D Thompson; H Asanuma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Physiological basis of motor effects of a transient stimulus to cerebral cortex.

Authors:  V E Amassian; M Stewart; G J Quirk; J L Rosenthal
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D Burke; R Hicks; S C Gandevia; J Stephen; I Woodforth; M Crawford
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Modelling magnetic coil excitation of human cerebral cortex with a peripheral nerve immersed in a brain-shaped volume conductor: the significance of fiber bending in excitation.

Authors:  V E Amassian; L Eberle; P J Maccabee; R Q Cracco
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10

10.  The patterns and synaptic properties of horizontal intracortical connections in the rat motor cortex.

Authors:  V A Aroniadou; A Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  121 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Bartres-Faz; J P Keenan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Mechanisms of intracortical I-wave facilitation elicited with paired-pulse magnetic stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Yasuo Terao; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Yasushi Shiio; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Haruo Uesugi; Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Ichiro Kanazawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Tihomir V Ilić; Frank Meintzschel; Ulrich Cleff; Diane Ruge; Kirn R Kessler; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Further evidence to support different mechanisms underlying intracortical inhibition of the motor cortex.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Yasushi Shiio; Shingo Okabe; Ichiro Kanazawa; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Yongqiang Zhao; Ulf Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Responses of single motor units in human masseter to transcranial magnetic stimulation of either hemisphere.

Authors:  Sophie L Pearce; Timothy S Miles; Philip D Thompson; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Excitability changes in human hand motor area dependent on afferent inputs induced by different motor tasks.

Authors:  Makoto Takahashi; Kenichi Sugawara; Shikako Hayashi; Tatsuya Kasai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry.

Authors:  R Salvador; S Silva; P J Basser; P C Miranda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Measures of cortical plasticity after transcranial paired associative stimulation predict changes in electroencephalogram slow-wave activity during subsequent sleep.

Authors:  Reto Huber; Sara Määttä; Steve K Esser; Simone Sarasso; Fabio Ferrarelli; Adam Watson; Florinda Ferreri; Michael J Peterson; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.