Literature DB >> 3543727

Physiological basis of motor effects of a transient stimulus to cerebral cortex.

V E Amassian, M Stewart, G J Quirk, J L Rosenthal.   

Abstract

This contribution includes a selective review of previously published material, findings from some new experiments, and discussion of some relationships between animal and recent human data. The major questions are: What descends from the cerebral cortex after a brief surface stimulus? What explains the various components of the corticofugal discharge? What are the motor consequences of the corticofugal discharge, and what are the effects of lesions on both? The focus is on the corticospinal system, which through its monosynaptic connection with alpha motoneurons of distal muscles accounts for the short latency movements after a transient cortical stimulus. The pyramidal and lateral corticospinal tract response in monkey or cat to a surface stimulus applied to area 4 is a direct (D) wave conducted in fast axons followed by several indirect (I) waves with a period of greater than 1 ms. Although computer summing reveals, at increasing amplitudes, D and I waves in recordings from nuchal skin, vertebra, and surface of the spinal cord, "killed end" recording is essential to reveal the true extent of I relative to D waves. The D wave might result from excitation of: the initial segment (IS), i.e., the classical spike trigger zone; the first or deeper nodes in white matter; or arborizations of the axon collaterals in gray matter. Under different circumstances, each of these modes of excitation can be effective. Thus, with threshold stimulation through separated bipolar electrodes, intracellular recording from pyramidal tract (PT) and uninvaded motor cortical neurons shows that D activation usually occurs when the membrane potential immediately before the stimulus is relatively depolarized, implying excitation of the IS region, i.e., close to the site of synaptic transfer. A monopolar surface (+) stimulus at the appropriate focus usually generates a D wave at weaker intensity than does a surface (-) stimulus. However, if a little above threshold, stimuli of either polarity generate both D and I waves, but the ratio of D:I amplitude is usually greater with surface (+) stimulation. A theoretical estimate of the depth of excitation by a surface (+) stimulus was consistent with threshold excitation occurring at the first node. Slow PT neurons are excited by surface stimulation, but trivially contribute to population PT or corticospinal recordings. Intracellular recording from PT neurons identifies a monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potential as the cause of the first I wave, the period between successive I waves reflecting single delays for synaptic discharge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3543727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  94 in total

1.  Spinal cord-evoked potentials and muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in 10 awake human subjects.

Authors:  D A Houlden; M L Schwartz; C H Tator; P Ashby; W A MacKay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Mechanisms of intracortical I-wave facilitation elicited with paired-pulse magnetic stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Yasuo Terao; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Yasushi Shiio; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Haruo Uesugi; Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Ichiro Kanazawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Task-dependent modulation of excitatory and inhibitory functions within the human primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Michele Tinazzi; Simona Farina; Stefano Tamburin; Stefano Facchini; Antonio Fiaschi; Domenico Restivo; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Tihomir V Ilić; Frank Meintzschel; Ulrich Cleff; Diane Ruge; Kirn R Kessler; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Nguyen; Julien Nizard; Yves Keravel; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Yongqiang Zhao; Ulf Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Excitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  S A Edgley; J A Eyre; R N Lemon; S Miller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Corticospinal volleys evoked by anodal and cathodal stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  D Burke; R G Hicks; J P Stephen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: specific and non-specific facilitation of magnetic motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  A Hufnagel; M Jaeger; C E Elger
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Excitability of corticospinal neurons during tonic muscle contractions in man.

Authors:  B Brouwer; P Ashby; G Midroni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.