Literature DB >> 8068071

Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

D Burke1, R Hicks, S C Gandevia, J Stephen, I Woodforth, M Crawford.   

Abstract

1. The effects of graded transcranial magnetic and anodal electrical stimulation of the human motor cortex were compared in human subjects undergoing orthopaedic operations on the spine, before and after withdrawal of volatile anaesthesia. Corticospinal volleys were recorded from the spinal cord in the low-cervical and low-thoracic regions (six subjects) or the mid-thoracic region (two subjects) using bipolar electrodes inserted into the epidural space. 2. Electrical stimuli were delivered using anode at the vertex and cathode 7 cm laterally. The corticospinal volley at threshold consisted of a single deflection with a mean latency to peak of 4.17 ms at the rostral recording site. With further increases in stimulus strength the latency of this D wave shortened in two steps, first by 0.89 ms (seven subjects) and then by a further 0.8 ms (two subjects), indicating that the site of activation of some corticospinal neurones had shifted to deep subcortical sites. 3. When volatile anaesthetics were given, a corticospinal volley could not be defined in three subjects with magnetic stimuli of 70, 80 and 100% maximal stimulator output with the coil at the vertex (Novametrix Magstim 200, round coil, external diameter 14 cm). In the remaining five subjects, the component of lowest threshold was a D wave recorded at the rostral site at 4.0 ms when stimulus intensity was, on average, 70%. With stimuli of 90-100% a total of five small I waves could be defined in the five subjects (i.e. on average one I wave per subject). 4. After cessation of volatile anaesthetics in seven subjects, the thresholds for D and I waves were lower and their amplitudes were greater. The D wave remained the component of lowest threshold in all subjects, appearing at the low-cervical level with magnetic stimuli of 50%. However, in three subjects I waves also appeared at D wave threshold, and the D wave was smaller than with electrical stimulation at I wave threshold. There was no consistent change in latency of the magnetic D wave as stimulus intensity was increased to 100%. 5. These findings suggest that the previously reported difference in latency of the EMG potentials produced in upper-limb muscles by anodal stimulation and magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex is not because the corticospinal volley induced by magnetic stimulation lacks a D wave.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8068071      PMCID: PMC1143923          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  15 in total

1.  Corticospinal volleys evoked by anodal and cathodal stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  D Burke; R G Hicks; J P Stephen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; B L Day; S Boyd; C D Marsden
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.969

3.  A comparison of corticospinal activation by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation of monkey motor cortex.

Authors:  V E Amassian; G J Quirk; M Stewart
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

4.  Descending volley after electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation in man.

Authors:  A Berardelli; M Inghilleri; G Cruccu; M Manfredi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1990-04-20       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses.

Authors:  B L Day; D Dressler; A Maertens de Noordhout; C D Marsden; K Nakashima; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; J P Dick; J M Cowan; A Berardelli; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Responses of the pyramidal tract to stimulation of the baboon's motor cortex.

Authors:  D Kernell; W U Chien-Ping
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Some effects of isoflurane on I waves of the motor evoked potential.

Authors:  R G Hicks; I J Woodforth; M R Crawford; J P Stephen; D J Burke
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Intra-operative recording of motor tract potentials at the cervico-medullary junction following scalp electrical and magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex.

Authors:  P D Thompson; B L Day; H A Crockard; I Calder; N M Murray; J C Rothwell; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Corticospinal volleys evoked by electrical stimulation of human motor cortex after withdrawal of volatile anaesthetics.

Authors:  R Hicks; D Burke; J Stephen; I Woodforth; M Crawford
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  70 in total

1.  Spinal cord-evoked potentials and muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in 10 awake human subjects.

Authors:  D A Houlden; M L Schwartz; C H Tator; P Ashby; W A MacKay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Suppression of EMG activity by transcranial magnetic stimulation in human subjects during walking.

Authors:  N T Petersen; J E Butler; V Marchand-Pauvert; R Fisher; A Ledebt; H S Pyndt; N L Hansen; J B Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Interaction of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical transmastoid stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  Janet L Taylor; N T Petersen; Jane E Butler; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The effect of electrical stimulation of the corticospinal tract on motor units of the human biceps brachii.

Authors:  Nicolas T Petersen; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Excitability changes in human peripheral nerve axons in a paradigm mimicking paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jane H L Chan; Cindy S-Y Lin; Emmanuel Pierrot-Deseilligny; David Burke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on vibratory-induced presynaptic inhibition of the soleus H reflex.

Authors:  Jessica Guzmán-López; João Costa; Aikaterini Selvi; Gonzalo Barraza; Jordi Casanova-Molla; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Assessment of corticospinal excitability after traumatic spinal cord injury using MEP recruitment curves: a preliminary TMS study.

Authors:  R Nardone; Y Höller; A Thomschewski; A C Bathke; A R Ellis; S M Golaszewski; F Brigo; E Trinka
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Influence of sensory deprivation and perturbation of trigeminal afferent fibers on corticomotor control of human tongue musculature.

Authors:  L Halkjaer; B Melsen; A S McMillan; P Svensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Evidence that a transcortical pathway contributes to stretch reflexes in the tibialis anterior muscle in man.

Authors:  N Petersen; L O Christensen; H Morita; T Sinkjaer; J Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.