Literature DB >> 1385089

Modelling magnetic coil excitation of human cerebral cortex with a peripheral nerve immersed in a brain-shaped volume conductor: the significance of fiber bending in excitation.

V E Amassian1, L Eberle, P J Maccabee, R Q Cracco.   

Abstract

To help elucidate some basic principles of magnetic coil (MC) excitation of cerebral cortex, a model system was devised in which mammalian phrenic nerve, or amphibian sciatic nerve with its branches was suspended in appropriate Ringer's solution in a human brain-shaped volume conductor, an inverted plastic skull. The nerve was recorded monophasically out of the volume conductor. The site of nerve excitation by the MC was identified by finding where along the nerve a bipolar electrical stimulus yielded a similar action potential latency. MC excitation of hand-related corticospinal (CT) neurons was modelled by giving the distal end of nerve attached to the lateral skull an initial radial (perpendicular) trajectory, with subsequent bends towards the base and posterior part of the skull; this nerve was optimally excited by a laterally placed figure 8 or round MC when the induced electric field led to outward membrane current at the initial bend. By contrast, nerve given a trajectory modelling CT neurons related to the foot was optimally excited when the coil windings were across the midline, but again when membrane current flowed outward at the first bend. Corticocortical fibers were modelled by placing the nerve in the anteroposterior axis lateral to the midline; with the round MC vertex-tangentially orientated, optimal excitation occurred at the bend nearest the interaural line, i.e., near the peak electric field. The findings emphasize the importance of orientation and direction of current in the MC and fiber bends in determining nerve excitation. The findings in the peripheral nerve-skull model help explain (1) why lateral and vertex-tangentially orientated MCs preferentially excite arm-related CT neurons directly and indirectly (through corticocortical fibers), respectively, and (2) why the MC orientations for optimally exciting directly arm and leg-related CT neurons differ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1385089     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90105-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  56 in total

1.  Spinal cord-evoked potentials and muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in 10 awake human subjects.

Authors:  D A Houlden; M L Schwartz; C H Tator; P Ashby; W A MacKay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Functional localization in the human brain: Gradient-Echo, Spin-Echo, and arterial spin-labeling fMRI compared with neuronavigated TMS.

Authors:  Svenja Diekhoff; Kamil Uludağ; Roland Sparing; Marc Tittgemeyer; Mustafa Cavuşoğlu; D Yves von Cramon; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Yongqiang Zhao; Ulf Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Evaluation of an image-guided, robotically positioned transcranial magnetic stimulation system.

Authors:  Jack L Lancaster; Shalini Narayana; Dennis Wenzel; James Luckemeyer; John Roby; Peter Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Column-based model of electric field excitation of cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Peter T Fox; Shalini Narayana; Nitin Tandon; Hugo Sandoval; Sarabeth P Fox; Peter Kochunov; Jack L Lancaster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Assessing cortical network properties using TMS-EEG.

Authors:  Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Neurostimulation in Alzheimer's disease: from basic research to clinical applications.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Frediano Tezzon; Monica Christova; Kerstin Schwenker; Stefan Golaszewski; Eugen Trinka; Francesco Brigo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Short-latency subliminal effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on forearm motoneurones.

Authors:  F Baldissera; P Cavallari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  High γ power in ECoG reflects cortical electrical stimulation effects on unit activity in layers V/VI.

Authors:  Azadeh Yazdan-Shahmorad; Daryl R Kipke; Mark J Lehmkuhle
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.