Literature DB >> 7525244

Finding the depth of magnetic brain stimulation: a re-evaluation.

D Rudiak1, E Marg.   

Abstract

The depth of threshold magnetic nerve stimulation can be estimated by using thresholds from two different-sized stimulus coils and plotting their induced electric field vs. depth profiles. Stimulation is presumed to take place where the two field profiles are equal. If the two coils have unequal inductances, however, there is a relative shift in threshold between coils that alters the intersection point and the apparent stimulus depth. This systematic error arises from two sources: (1) there is a difference in the fraction of stimulator energy reaching each coil, and (2) pulse durations are different, causing threshold shifts governed by the nerve strength-duration curve. Both sources of error are additive. If the larger coil has the lesser inductance, stimulus depth is underestimated; if it has the greater inductance, it is overestimated. This can lead to large disparities in the measured depth, depending on the sets of coils used. In this paper, we show how to correct for errors introduced by unequal inductance and how this resolves discrepancies in depth measurement. Our own depth measurements in the motor area for threshold finger movements, and recalculated depths from Epstein et al., indicate that stimulation is slightly deeper (18-21 mm, average 19+ mm) than previously thought. This suggests that threshold magnetic stimulation in the motor area may arise from large, tangentially oriented fibers in the superficial white matter, or in the gray matter at the upper sulcus or lip of the gyrus.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7525244     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90124-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  32 in total

Review 1.  Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Authors:  Mario Manto; James M Bower; Adriana Bastos Conforto; José M Delgado-García; Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda; Marcus Gerwig; Christophe Habas; Nobuhiro Hagura; Richard B Ivry; Peter Mariën; Marco Molinari; Eiichi Naito; Dennis A Nowak; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Denis Pelisson; Claudia D Tesche; Caroline Tilikete; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Lindsay M Oberman; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-02

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the supramarginal gyrus: a window to perception of upright.

Authors:  Amir Kheradmand; Adrian Lasker; David S Zee
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Multi-modality mapping of motor cortex: comparing echoplanar BOLD fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Short communication.

Authors:  D R Roberts; D J Vincent; A M Speer; D E Bohning; J Cure; J Young; M S George
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil.

Authors:  K Sakai; Y Ugawa; Y Terao; R Hanajima; T Furubayashi; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Low- and High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects on Resting-State Functional Connectivity Between the Postcentral Gyrus and the Insula.

Authors:  Merideth A Addicott; Bruce Luber; Duy Nguyen; Hannah Palmer; Sarah H Lisanby; Lawrence Gregory Appelbaum
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2019-04-02

Review 7.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

8.  Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Electric Field Model of Transcranial Electric Stimulation in Nonhuman Primates: Correspondence to Individual Motor Threshold.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Sarah H Lisanby; Andrew F Laine; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and connectivity mapping: tools for studying the neural bases of brain disorders.

Authors:  M Hampson; R E Hoffman
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.