Literature DB >> 1697241

Spatial distribution of the electric field induced in volume by round and figure '8' magnetic coils: relevance to activation of sensory nerve fibers.

P J Maccabee1, L Eberle, V E Amassian, R Q Cracco, A Rudell, M Jayachandra.   

Abstract

The electric fields induced in finite homogeneous volume conductors by a round and a figure '8' magnetic coil (MC) were measured and related to MC stimulation of the median nerve. The volume conductors, filled with isotonic saline, consisted of a large rectangular trough ('unrestricted') and a smaller trough, whose dimensions approximated human forearm ('restricted'). Various MC orientations were applied to the volume conductor. Bipolar recordings were obtained with a coaxial electrode, which measured the voltage gradient between the exposed edge of the cable shield and the central wire at its tip, 1 cm distant (a linear probe). The probe was moved in 3 dimensions, allowing computer reconstruction of the electric field as a function of the 3 spatial axes. When the probe was parallel to the plane of the round MC and tangential to the direction of current in its windings, the induced electric field was maximal; it tended towards zero when the probe was over the center of the MC, or when the probe, remaining parallel to the plane of the MC, was radial (i.e., perpendicular) to the direction of the current in the windings. For a variety of MC orientations, the electric field was consistently increased when the probe was adjacent and parallel to the edge of the trough, indicating the important effect of boundaries. The electric field was greatly increased focally when the round MC was applied orthogonally to the volume conductor, or when the figure '8' MC was applied tangentially (i.e., flat) to the volume conductor. With the figure '8' MC, a sharp central peak parallel to the long axis was bounded on each side by smaller (less than half amplitude) peaks. The findings from physical modeling led to correct predictions as to the most effective orientations of round and figure '8' MCs for eliciting sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) from the median nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1697241     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90211-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  9 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Bartres-Faz; J P Keenan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil.

Authors:  K Sakai; Y Ugawa; Y Terao; R Hanajima; T Furubayashi; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a new method for studying connectivity of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  T Paus; R Jech; C J Thompson; R Comeau; T Peters; A C Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  An additional source of potentials recorded from the scalp following magnetic stimulation over the lower occiput and adjoining neck.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; K J Werhahn; V E Amassian
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Magnetic coil stimulation of straight and bent amphibian and mammalian peripheral nerve in vitro: locus of excitation.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; V E Amassian; L P Eberle; R Q Cracco
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Consensus: New methodologies for brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; Martin Sommer; Gary Thickbroom; Masashi Hamada; Alvero Pascual-Leonne; Walter Paulus; Joseph Classen; Angel V Peterchev; Abraham Zangen; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Interhemispheric Connectivity Influences the Degree of Modulation of TMS-Induced Effects during Auditory Processing.

Authors:  Jamila Andoh; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-15

8.  Checklist on the Quality of the Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) Methods in Research: An International Delphi Study.

Authors:  Cyril Schneider; Andrea Zangrandi; Nico Sollmann; Michaela Veronika Bonfert; Louis-David Beaulieu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  A compact theory of magnetic nerve stimulation: predicting how to aim.

Authors:  Charles F Babbs
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.