Literature DB >> 1697531

A comparison of corticospinal activation by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation of monkey motor cortex.

V E Amassian1, G J Quirk, M Stewart.   

Abstract

The effects of different orientations of a Cadwell round magnetic coil (MC) were compared with each other and with surface electrical stimulation of motor cortex in monkeys anesthetized with pentobarbital or urethane. Recordings were made from within the lateral corticospinal tract, either from axonal populations or with a microelectrode from individual axons. A lateral-sagittally orientated MC directly excited corticospinal neurons at lower stimulus intensity than was required for indirect, i.e., transsynaptic excitation via inputs to corticospinal neurons. By contrast, in 2 out of 3 macaques tested, a vertex-tangential orientation could excite corticospinal neurons indirectly at lower intensities than were required for direct excitation; at higher intensities, direct excitation also occurred. The site of direct corticospinal excitation by a lateral-sagittally orientated MC was inferred by comparing the response variability and latency to MC and surface electrical stimuli. Cathodal stimuli elicited more variable corticospinal population responses and later individual axonal responses than were obtained with anodal stimuli. The variability in response is attributed to interaction between nearby, on-going synaptic bombardment and the stimulus, implying that surface cathodal stimuli directly activate corticospinal neurons at the spike trigger zone (presumably the initial segment). By contrast, the consistency and reduced latency of the corticospinal responses to surface anodal stimuli are attributed to the direct excitation of corticospinal fibers within the white matter. When the stimulus intensity is clearly above threshold, surface anodal and cathodal stimuli can activate corticospinal neurons both directly and indirectly. Direct corticospinal excitation by the MC can resemble the effects of either surface anodal or surface cathodal stimuli. We conclude that the MC can activate corticospinal neurons at the spike trigger zone or their fibers deeper in white matter. The findings in the monkey are used to interpret the effects of different MC orientations in the human.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1697531     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(90)90061-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  46 in total

1.  Spinal cord-evoked potentials and muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in 10 awake human subjects.

Authors:  D A Houlden; M L Schwartz; C H Tator; P Ashby; W A MacKay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Mechanisms of intracortical I-wave facilitation elicited with paired-pulse magnetic stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Yasuo Terao; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Yasushi Shiio; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Haruo Uesugi; Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Ichiro Kanazawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Tihomir V Ilić; Frank Meintzschel; Ulrich Cleff; Diane Ruge; Kirn R Kessler; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Neural summation in human motor cortex by subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulations.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Fow-Sen Choa; Ann Summerfelt; Malle A Tagamets; Laura M Rowland; Peter Kochunov; Paul Shepard; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hysteresis in corticospinal excitability during gradual muscle contraction and relaxation in humans.

Authors:  Toshitaka Kimura; Kentaro Yamanaka; Daichi Nozaki; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Tasuku Miyoshi; Masami Akai; Tatsuyuki Ohtsuki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Evaluation of an image-guided, robotically positioned transcranial magnetic stimulation system.

Authors:  Jack L Lancaster; Shalini Narayana; Dennis Wenzel; James Luckemeyer; John Roby; Peter Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Comparison of motor effects following subcortical electrical stimulation through electrodes in the globus pallidus internus and cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Andrea A Kühn; Stephan A Brandt; Andreas Kupsch; Thomas Trottenberg; Jan Brocke; Kerstin Irlbacher; Gerd H Schneider; Bernd-Ulrich Meyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal cortex on metabolic brain activity: a 14C-2DG tracing study in the cat.

Authors:  Antoni Valero-Cabré; Bertram R Payne; Jarrett Rushmore; Stephen G Lomber; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Short-latency subliminal effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on forearm motoneurones.

Authors:  F Baldissera; P Cavallari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.