Literature DB >> 17703287

Influence of gravitoinertial force level on the subjective vertical during recumbent yaw axis body tilt.

A S Bryan1, S B Bortolami, J Ventura, P DiZio, J R Lackner.   

Abstract

We tilted recumbent subjects at various angles about their yaw (foot to head) axis and had them indicate the direction of their subjective vertical and apparent head midline about the same axis. One set of tests was conducted during parabolic flight maneuvers where the background gravitoinertial acceleration varied from 0 to 1.8g. The blindfolded subjects (n = 6) were tested supine and at tilts of 60 degrees and 30 degrees left and right about their horizontal long body axis. They used a gravity neutral joystick to indicate their subjective vertical or their head midline continuously from the high force through the 0g portions of parabolas. In 0g, all subjects felt supine and oriented the joystick perpendicular to their body when indicating the subjective vertical. This points to strong influences of the symmetric somatic touch and pressure cues from the apparatus on orientation when the otolith organs are unloaded. In contrast to the settings in 0g, settings of the subjective vertical in 1g and 1.8g varied as a function of body orientation. However, the settings did not differ between 1g and 1.8g test conditions. Subjective vertical judgments were also made by subjects (n = 11) in the Brandeis slow rotation room, with the room stationary and rotating at a speed that produced a 2g resultant of gravitational and centrifugal acceleration. There were no differences between settings of the subjective vertical made in 1g and 2g. The similarity of 1g and hyper-g settings during recumbent yaw tilts, both in parabolic flight and in the rotating room, contrasts with the previously observed, strong influence which force levels above 1g have on settings of the subjective vertical during tilt of the body in pitch or roll. The findings for all three axes are consistent with a recently developed model of static spatial orientation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17703287     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1058-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates.

Authors:  A D Van Beuzekom; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Perception of tilt (somatogravic illusion) in response to sustained linear acceleration during space flight.

Authors:  G Clément; S T Moore; T Raphan; B Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt.

Authors:  Ronald G Kaptein; Jan A M Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visual perception of the horizontal during prolonged exposure to radial acceleration on a centrifuge.

Authors:  B CLARK; A GRAYBIEL
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-03

5.  The relative role of visual and non-visual cues in determining the perceived direction of "up": experiments in parabolic flight.

Authors:  H L Jenkin; R T Dyde; J E Zacher; D C Zikovitz; M R Jenkin; R S Allison; I P Howard; L R Harris
Journal:  Acta Astronaut       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.413

6.  Mechanisms of human static spatial orientation.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; S Rocca; S Daros; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; M Q McHenry; J D Dickman; S D Newlands; B J Hess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt.

Authors:  D M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Inversion illusion in parabolic flight: its probable dependence on otolith function.

Authors:  A Graybiel; R S Kellogg
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1967-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Angular displacement perception modulated by force background.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Direction of balance and perception of the upright are perceptually dissociable.

Authors:  Heather Panic; Alexander Sacha Panic; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Perception of Upright: Multisensory Convergence and the Role of Temporo-Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Amir Kheradmand; Ariel Winnick
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.