Literature DB >> 12632236

Influence of dynamic tilts on the perception of earth-vertical.

Karin Jaggi-Schwarz1, Bernhard J M Hess.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that optimal activation of both the semicircular canals and the otoliths provides reliable vestibular cues about self-orientation in space. For this, we measured the ability of subjects to estimate the subjective vertical immediately, 20 s and 90 s after a rapid tilt (180 degrees /s(2)) from upright into different roll positions between 90 degrees left and right side down. Subjects had to estimate the earth-vertical and earth-horizontal direction in the dark by (a) setting a luminous line, (b) performing saccades, and (c) verbally declaring body position relative to gravity. The mean error curves from the three paradigms showed consistent E (Müller)- and A (Aubert)-effects, which did not significantly change over time. Horizontal and vertical saccade tasks exhibited different response characteristics, as previously reported by others, which likely reflect different computation mechanisms. The verbal estimation paradigm yielded complementary results to those of the luminous line paradigm and vertical saccade task. The E-effect of the luminous line and the vertical saccade paradigm might be explained by a bias towards earth-vertical due to interactions of vestibular and neck afferent signals. The invariably small A-effect of the luminous line and the vertical saccade paradigm probably reflects somatosensory signals that had relatively weak influence in our experiments. We conclude that phasic activation of the vestibular system reduces the influence of non-vestibular cues observed in low tilt velocity or static experiments. Although this activation generates an E-effect, the total error in the range of +/-90 degrees is reduced.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12632236     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1343-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates.

Authors:  A D Van Beuzekom; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Assessment of the perception of verticality and horizontality with self-paced saccades.

Authors:  V E Pettorossi; D Bambagioni; A M Bronstein; M A Gresty
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vestibular memory-contingent saccades involve somatosensory input from the body support.

Authors:  T Mergner; G Nasios; D Anastasopoulos
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-05-11       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  The role of ocular torsion in visual measures of vestibular function.

Authors:  I S Curthoys
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Considerations on Listing's Law and the primary position by means of a matrix description of eye position control.

Authors:  W Haustein
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Transient torsion during and after saccades.

Authors:  D Straumann; D S Zee; D Solomon; A G Lasker; D C Roberts
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perception of passive whole-body rotations in the absence of neck and body proprioception.

Authors:  J Blouin; J L Vercher; G M Gauthier; J Paillard; C Bard; Y Lamarre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Horizontal eye position-related activity in neck muscles of the alert cat.

Authors:  P P Vidal; A Roucoux; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A case of thalamic syndrome: somatosensory influences on visual orientation.

Authors:  D Anastasopoulos; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Control of the head in response to tilt of the body in normal and labyrinthine-defective human subjects.

Authors:  T Kanaya; M A Gresty; A M Bronstein; D Buckwell; B Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  13 in total

1.  Direction specific error patterns during continuous tracking of the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  S Keusch; B J M Hess; K Jaggi-Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reciprocal error behavior in estimated body position and subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  K Jaggi-Schwarz; M Ortega; B J M Hess
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Roll rotation cues influence roll tilt perception assayed using a somatosensory technique.

Authors:  Sukyung Park; Claire Gianna-Poulin; F Owen Black; Scott Wood; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance.

Authors:  W G Wright; S Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Head roll dependent variability of subjective visual vertical and ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Gravity dependence of the effect of optokinetic stimulation on the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Christopher J Bockisch; Nicoletta Caramia; Giovanni Bertolini; Alexander Andrea Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Dissociating vestibular and somatosensory contributions to spatial orientation.

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Luc P J Selen; Giovanni Bertolini; Dominik Straumann; W Pieter Medendorp; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Modulation of internal estimates of gravity during and after prolonged roll-tilts.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Giovanni Bertolini; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Sarah Marti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Differential effects of visual feedback on subjective visual vertical accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Daniel Bjasch; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of Head Position on Perception of Gravity in Vestibular Neuritis and Lateral Medullary Infarction.

Authors:  Sung-Hee Kim; Ji-Soo Kim
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.