Literature DB >> 17180705

Role of gravity-based information on the orientation and localization of the perceived body midline.

Hadrien Ceyte1, Corinne Cian, Vincent Nougier, Isabelle Olivier, Marion Trousselard.   

Abstract

The present study focused on the influence of gravity-based information on the orientation and localization of the perceived body midline. The orientation was investigated by the rolling adjustment of a rod on the subjects' Z-axis and the localization by the horizontal adjustment of a visual dot as being straight ahead. Experiment 1 investigated the effect of the dissociation between the Z-axis and the direction of gravity by placing subjects in roll tilt and supine postures. In roll tilt, the perception of the body midline orientation was deviated in the direction of body tilt and the perception of its localization was deviated in the opposite direction. In the supine body orientation, estimates of the Z-axis and straight-ahead remained veridical as when the body was upright. Experiment 2 highlighted the relative importance of the otolithic and tactile information using diffuse pressure stimulation. The estimation of body midline orientation was modified contrarily to the estimation of its localization. Thus, subjects had no absolute representation of their egocentric space. The main hypothesis regarding the dissociation between the orientation and localization of the body midline may be related to a difference in the integration of sensory information. It can be suggested that the horizontal component of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) contributed to the perceived localization of the body midline, whereas its orientation was mainly influenced by tactile information.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17180705     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0764-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  14 in total

1.  Conjugacy of torsional eye movements in response to a head tilt paradigm.

Authors:  Tony Pansell; Jan Ygge; Hermann D Schworm
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  EFFECT OF BODY TILT ON APPARENT VERTICALITY, APPARENT BODY POSITION, AND THEIR RELATION.

Authors:  M BAUERMEISTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1964-02

3.  Perceived body position and the visual horizontal.

Authors:  F Mast; T Jarchow
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  The effect of water immersion on postural and visual orientation.

Authors:  T Jarchow; F W Mast
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1999-09

5.  The effect of water immersion on perception of the visual vertical.

Authors:  N J Wade
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1973-08

6.  Tactile stimulation and perception of the vertical. I. Effects of diffuse vs. specific tactile stimulation.

Authors:  H Nyborg
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1971

7.  Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task.

Authors:  D Bowers; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Bisecting rods and lines: effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects.

Authors:  J L Bradshaw; N C Nettleton; G Nathan; L Wilson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Subjective postural orientation and visual vertical during slow pitch tilt for the seated human subject.

Authors:  Y Ito; M A Gresty
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1997-01

10.  Contribution of somesthetic cues to the perception of body orientation and subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Marion Trousselard; Corinne Cian; Vincent Nougier; Simon Pla; Christian Raphel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-11
View more
  8 in total

1.  The oculogyral illusion: retinal and oculomotor factors.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; A Bryan; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Antihysteresis of perceived longitudinal body axis during continuous quasi-static whole-body rotation in the earth-vertical roll plane.

Authors:  M Tatalias; C J Bockisch; G Bertolini; D Straumann; A Palla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Otolith signals contribute to inter-individual differences in the perception of gravity-centered space.

Authors:  C Cian; P A Barraud; A C Paillard; S Hidot; P Denise; J Ventre-Dominey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visuospatial contextual processing in the parietal cortex: an fMRI investigation of the induced Roelofs effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth Walter; Paul Dassonville
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The habitual motor vertical of humans depends on gravicentric and egocentric cues, but only little on visual cues.

Authors:  Nils Bury; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Whole-Body Roll Tilt Influences Goal-Directed Upper Limb Movements through the Perceptual Tilt of Egocentric Reference Frame.

Authors:  Keisuke Tani; Yoshihide Shiraki; Shinji Yamamoto; Yasushi Kodaka; Keisuke Kushiro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-15

7.  Disruption of spatial task performance in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Dewi Guardia; Aurélie Carey; Olivier Cottencin; Pierre Thomas; Marion Luyat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spatial Alignment and Response Hand in Geometric and Motion Illusions.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Michela Paroli; Natale A Stucchi; Anna Sedda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.