Literature DB >> 16628401

Localization of the subjective vertical during roll, pitch, and recumbent yaw body tilt.

Simone B Bortolami1, Alberto Pierobon, Paul DiZio, James R Lackner.   

Abstract

Localization of the subjective vertical during body tilt in pitch and in roll has been extensively studied because of the relevance of these axes for aviation and control of posture. Studies of yaw orientation relative to gravity are lacking. Our goal was to perform the first thorough evaluation of static orientation in recumbent yaw and to collect as efficiently as possible roll and pitch orientation data which would be consistent with the literature, using the same technique as our yaw tests. This would create the first comprehensive, coherent data set for all three axes suitable for quantitative tri-dimensional modeling of spatial orientation. We tested localization of the vertical for subjects tilted in pitch (-100 degrees to +130 degrees ), in roll (-90 degrees to +90 degrees ), and in yaw while recumbent (-80 degrees to +80 degrees ). We had subjects point a gravity-neutral probe to the gravitational vertical (haptically indicated vertical) and report verbally their perceived tilt. Subjects underestimated their body tilts in recumbent yaw and pitch and overestimated their tilts in roll. The haptic settings for pitch and roll were consistent with data in the literature obtained with haptic and visual indications. Our data constitute the first tri-dimensional assessment of the subjective vertical using a common measurement procedure and provide the basis for the tri-axial modeling of vestibular function presented in the companion paper.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16628401     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0385-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates.

Authors:  A D Van Beuzekom; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Perception of tilt (somatogravic illusion) in response to sustained linear acceleration during space flight.

Authors:  G Clément; S T Moore; T Raphan; B Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt.

Authors:  Ronald G Kaptein; Jan A M Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  An analysis of ocular counterrolling in response to body positions in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  U J Bucher; F Mast; N Bischof
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Visual perception of the horizontal during prolonged exposure to radial acceleration on a centrifuge.

Authors:  B CLARK; A GRAYBIEL
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-03

6.  Mechanisms of human static spatial orientation.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; S Rocca; S Daros; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Vertical and horizontal eye displacement during static pitch and roll postures.

Authors:  K Citek; S M Ebenholtz
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Visual horizontal-perception in relation to otolith-function.

Authors:  E F Miller; A R Fregly; A Graybiel
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1968-12
View more
  21 in total

1.  Mechanisms of human static spatial orientation.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; S Rocca; S Daros; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of gravitoinertial force level on the subjective vertical during recumbent yaw axis body tilt.

Authors:  A S Bryan; S B Bortolami; J Ventura; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Angular displacement perception modulated by force background.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of gaze elevation on estimating the possibility of passing under high obstacles during body tilt.

Authors:  Aurore Bourrelly; Lionel Bringoux; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Symmetries of a generic utricular projection: neural connectivity and the distribution of utricular information.

Authors:  Thomas Chartrand; Gin McCollum; Douglas A Hanes; Richard D Boyle
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Human perceptual overestimation of whole body roll tilt in hypergravity.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Michael C Newman; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld; Laurence R Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Psychophysical Haptic Measurement of Vertical Perception: Elucidating a Hand Sensory Bias.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Jorge Otero-Millan; Jing Tian; Amir Kheradmand
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane.

Authors:  Jeanine R Schuler; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Roll tilt psychophysics in rhesus monkeys during vestibular and visual stimulation.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Csilla Haburcakova; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.