Literature DB >> 21912838

Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Andrew M Briggs1, Egon Perilli, Ian H Parkinson, Susan Kantor, Tim V Wrigley, Nicola L Fazzalari, John D Wark.   

Abstract

Although a strong relationship exists between areal bone mineral density (aBMD) derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone strength, the predictive validity of aBMD for osteoporotic vertebral fractures remains suboptimal. The diagnostic sensitivity of DXA may be improved by assessing aBMD within vertebral subregions, rather than relying on an estimate derived from the total area of the vertebra. The objective of this study was to validate a method of measuring subregional vertebral aBMD in vitro using lateral-projection DXA against subregional volumetric BMD (vBMD) measured with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). A mixed set of 49 lumbar and thoracic vertebrae from 25 donors were scanned using lateral-projection DXA and pQCT. aBMD and apparent vBMD were measured in 7 vertebral regions (1 total area and 6 subregions) from the lateral DXA scan. vBMD was calculated in anatomically equivalent regions from pQCT scan data, using a customised software program designed to increase efficiency of the analysis process. Significant differences in densitometric parameters between subregions were observed by DXA and pQCT (P < 0.01). Subregional vBMD derived from pQCT was explained by a significant proportion of the variance in DXA-derived aBMD (R (2) = 0.51-0.67, P < 0.05) and apparent vBMD (R (2) = 0.64-0.75, P < 0.05). These results confirm the validity of measuring aBMD in vertebral subregions using lateral-projection DXA. The clinical significance should now be explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21912838     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-011-0307-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  49 in total

1.  Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates.

Authors:  J P Grant; T R Oxland; M F Dvorak
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Neural arch load-bearing in old and degenerated spines.

Authors:  P Pollintine; A S Przybyla; P Dolan; M A Adams
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Global and regional variations in the spinal trabecular bone: single and dual energy examinations.

Authors:  T Sandor; D Felsenberg; W A Kalender; E Brown
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro.

Authors:  E N Ebbesen; J S Thomsen; H Beck-Nielsen; H J Nepper-Rasmussen; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Central region-of-interest analysis of lumbar spine densitometry demonstrates lower bone mass in older rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  D Krueger; H Todd; A Haffa; J Bruner; D Yandow; N Binkley
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Novel assessment of subregional bone mineral density using DXA and pQCT and subregional microarchitecture using micro-CT in whole human vertebrae: applications, methods, and correspondence between technologies.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Egon Perilli; Ian H Parkinson; Tim V Wrigley; Nicola L Fazzalari; Susan Kantor; John D Wark
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Regional distribution of spine and hip QCT BMD responses after one year of once-monthly ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Klaus Engelke; Thomas Fuerst; Gorana Dasic; Richard Y Davies; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Age- and region-dependent changes in human lumbar vertebral bone: a histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Olga Cvijanovic; Dragica Bobinac; Sanja Zoricic; Zdenko Ostojic; Ivana Maric; Zeljka Crncevic-Orlic; Ines Kristofic; Ljerka Ostojic
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The range of bone mineral density in healthy Canarian women by dual X-ray absorptiometry radiography and quantitative computer tomography.

Authors:  M Sosa; D Hernández; S Estévez; M Rodríguez; J M Limiñana; P Saavedra; P Láinez; P Diáz; P Betancor
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  4 in total

1.  Locally measured microstructural parameters are better associated with vertebral strength than whole bone density.

Authors:  J Hazrati Marangalou; F Eckstein; V Kuhn; K Ito; M Cataldi; F Taddei; B van Rietbergen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Heterogeneity of bone mineral density and fatigue failure of human vertebrae.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Laila M Poisson; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The intravertebral distribution of bone density: correspondence to intervertebral disc health and implications for vertebral strength.

Authors:  A I Hussein; T M Jackman; S R Morgan; G D Barest; E F Morgan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Glucocorticoid-induced bone loss is associated with abnormal intravertebral areal bone mineral density distribution.

Authors:  Louise I Manning; Andrew M Briggs; Sharon Van Doornum; Ashwini Kale; Susan Kantor; John D Wark
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.257

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.