Literature DB >> 1933591

Bone density measurements.

E M Alhava1.   

Abstract

Early diagnosis of osteoporosis is difficult. Bone density measurements, however, are helpful in screening patients at risk. Technology now provides means of measuring densities of both peripheral and central bones. The most practical method is dual X-ray densitometry, which is of good sensitivity and accuracy. Single photon absorptiometry on peripheral bones can be used to screen populations at risk. Computed tomography is also useful but the radiation dose is relatively high. In dual X-ray densitometry, calibration methods and comparisons with reference values are fairly reliable. The best sites for measurements are the lumbar spine and proximal femur, in which osteoporotic fractures are common. In general, however, one measurement is not enough. Biological variation is great. Repeated measurements will allow estimation of the rate of bone loss. Precise location of a previous site is sometimes difficult on reexamination and extraskeletal calcifications can be sources of error. Bone densitometry in connection with the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis is fairly easily performed with a single patient. Knowledge about the correlation between bone density and fracture risk is not yet adequate. The results of measurement of bone mineral density relate only to mineral content, not bone quality, i.e., differential diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteomalacia is not possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1933591     DOI: 10.1007/bf02555082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  22 in total

Review 1.  Methods of bone mineral measurement.

Authors:  P Tothill
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Bone mineral content and mechanical strength of the femoral neck.

Authors:  N Dalén; L G Hellström; B Jacobson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1976-10

3.  A method for determination of the mineral content and mineral density of the distal radius using gamma ray attenuation.

Authors:  P Karjalainen
Journal:  Ann Clin Res       Date:  1973-08

4.  Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; S F Hodgson; W M O'Fallon; E Y Chao; H W Wahner; J M Muhs; S L Cedel; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-03-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M L Brown; R L Morin; B L Riggs
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  The clinical relevance of calcaneus bone mineral measurements: a review.

Authors:  J M Vogel; R D Wasnich; P D Ross
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-10

7.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Single and dual energy tomographic analysis of spinal trabecular bone: a comparative study in normal and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  R Pacifici; N Susman; P L Carr; S J Birge; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Bone density in osteopenic women: a modified distal radius density measurement procedure to develop an "at risk" value for use in screening women.

Authors:  S A Grubb; P C Jacobson; B J Awbrey; W H McCartney; L M Vincent; R V Talmage
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Osteoporotic bone fragility. Detection by ultrasound transmission velocity.

Authors:  R P Heaney; L V Avioli; C H Chesnut; J Lappe; R R Recker; G H Brandenburger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Population screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures.

Authors:  T A Sheldon; N Freemantle; S Ibbotson; C Pollock; J Mason; A F Long
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-03

2.  Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W Yu; C C Glüer; S Grampp; M Jergas; T Fuerst; C Y Wu; Y Lu; B Fan; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Reconsideration of the relevance of mild wedge or short vertebral height deformities across a broad age distribution.

Authors:  W Yu; Q Lin; X Zhou; H Shao; P Sun
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; C M Langton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Bone augmentation in rabbit tibia using microfixed cobalt-chromium membranes with whole blood, tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow cells.

Authors:  Oscar Decco; Andrea Cura; Víctor Beltrán; María Lezcano; Wilfried Engelke
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

6.  Metacarpal bone mass in normal and osteoporotic Japanese women using computed X-ray densitometry.

Authors:  C Matsumoto; K Kushida; K Yamazaki; K Imose; T Inoue
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Automated computerized radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal and its correlation with absorptiometry of the forearm and spine.

Authors:  T Derisquebourg; P Dubois; J P Devogelaer; E Meys; B Duquesnoy; C Nagant de Deuxchaisnes; B Delcambre; X Marchandise
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Health-related quality of life in osteoporosis clinical trials. The Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group.

Authors:  G A Greendale; S L Silverman; R D Hays; C Cooper; T Spector; D Kiel; D B Reuben
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Comparison of areal and estimated volumetric bone mineral density values between older men and women.

Authors:  R A Faulkner; R G McCulloch; S L Fyke; W E De Coteau; H A McKay; D A Bailey; C S Houston; A A Wilkinson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.