Literature DB >> 22733092

Degenerative changes at the lumbar spine--implications for bone mineral density measurement in elderly women.

M Tenne1, F McGuigan, J Besjakov, P Gerdhem, K Åkesson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Degenerative changes of the lumbar spine may lead to misinterpretation of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements and cause underdiagnosis of osteoporosis. This longitudinal study of 1,044 women, 75 years at inclusion and followed for 10 years, shows that identification of apparent degenerative changes on the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan can increase the proportion diagnosed.
INTRODUCTION: In the elderly, degenerative manifestations in the lumbar spine may result in falsely elevated BMD values, consequently missing a large proportion of those with osteoporosis. Our aim was to determine the distribution and impact of degenerative changes on lumbar spine DXA over time and its clinical implications.
METHODS: Participants were 1,044 women from the population-based Osteoporosis Risk Assessment cohort. All women were 75 years old at invitation and followed up after 5 years (n=715) and 10 years (n=382). Degenerative changes were evaluated visually on the DXA image for each vertebra L1 to L4 (intraobserver precision kappa values of 0.66-0.70).
RESULTS: At baseline, apparent degenerative changes were more frequent in the inferior segments of the lumbar spine [5% (L1), 15% (L2), 26% (L3), and 36% (L4)] and increased over time. At 10 years, the prevalences were 20% (L1), 39% (L2), 59% (L3), 72% (L4), resulting in a significant increase in overall BMD. In women without apparent degenerative changes, BMD remained stable between 75 and 85 rather than an expected bone loss. At baseline, 37% had osteoporosis (BMD<-2.5) at L1-L4; exclusion of women with apparent degenerative changes increased this proportion to 47%. Using L1-L2, which was less prone to degenerative changes, 46% of women were classified as osteoporotic regardless of degenerative changes.
CONCLUSION: Degenerative changes were very common in elderly women, accelerated disproportionately over time, were increasingly frequent from vertebrae L1 to L4, and had significant impact on diagnosing osteoporosis. This suggests that routine reporting of spine BMD at L1-L2 would add valuable information for reassessment and monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22733092     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2048-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  38 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W Yu; C C Glüer; S Grampp; M Jergas; T Fuerst; C Y Wu; Y Lu; B Fan; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Discriminative ability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry site selection in identifying patients with osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Asma Arabi; Rafic Baddoura; Hassane Awada; Nabil Khoury; Souha Haddad; Ghazi Ayoub; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Position Development Conference.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; Mary B Leonard; Maria-Luisa Bianchi; Didier B Hans; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Craig B Langman; Frank Rauch
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Impact of degenerative radiographic abnormalities and vertebral fractures on spinal bone density of women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Lúcia Costa Paiva; Silvana Filardi; Aarão Mendes Pinto-Neto; Adil Samara; João Francisco Marques Neto
Journal:  Sao Paulo Med J       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 1.044

6.  Degenerative lumbar disc and facet disease in older adults: prevalence and clinical correlates.

Authors:  Gregory E Hicks; Natalia Morone; Debra K Weiner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Factors influencing lumbar spine bone mineral density assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with lumbar spinal radiogram.

Authors:  H Kinoshita; T Tamaki; T Hashimoto; F Kasagi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  The importance of severity of arthrosis for the reliability of bone mineral density measurement in women.

Authors:  Alper Hayirlioglu; Husnu Gokaslan; Canan Cimsit; Begumhan Baysal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  Osteoarthritis and osteoporosis: clinical and research evidence of inverse relationship.

Authors:  Jan Dequeker; Jeroen Aerssens; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  A population-based assessment of rates of bone loss at multiple skeletal sites: evidence for substantial trabecular bone loss in young adult women and men.

Authors:  B Lawrence Riggs; L Joseph Melton; Richard A Robb; Jon J Camp; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Lisa McDaniel; Shreyasee Amin; Peggy A Rouleau; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  38 in total

1.  Fracture predictive ability of physical performance tests and history of falls in elderly women: a 10-year prospective study.

Authors:  A Wihlborg; M Englund; K Åkesson; P Gerdhem
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Variation in the PTH2R gene is associated with age-related degenerative changes in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Kristina Åkesson; Max Tenne; Paul Gerdhem; Holger Luthman; Fiona E McGuigan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.

Authors:  Ki Hyuk Sung; Young Choi; Gyeong Hee Cho; Chin Youb Chung; Moon Seok Park; Kyoung Min Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Cortical porosity exhibits accelerated rate of change in peri- compared with post-menopausal women.

Authors:  L A Burt; J L Bhatla; D A Hanley; S K Boyd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Vertebral and femoral bone mineral density and bone strength in prostate cancer patients assessed in phantomless PET/CT examinations.

Authors:  Benedikt J Schwaiger; David L Kopperdahl; Lorenzo Nardo; Luca Facchetti; Alexandra S Gersing; Jan Neumann; Kwang J Lee; Tony M Keaveny; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Increasing fasting glucose and fasting insulin associated with elevated bone mineral density-evidence from cross-sectional and MR studies.

Authors:  H Zhou; C Li; W Song; M Wei; Y Cui; Q Huang; Q Wang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  [Identification, diagnostics and guideline conform therapy of osteoporosis (DVO) in trauma patients : a treatment algorithm].

Authors:  C Neuerburg; R Schmidmaier; S Schilling; C Kammerlander; W Böcker; W Mutschler; U Stumpf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Osteoporosis Imaging in the Geriatric Patient.

Authors:  Ursula Heilmeier; Jiwon Youm; Soheyla Torabi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2016-02-15

9.  Correspondence between bone mineral density and intervertebral disc degeneration across age and sex.

Authors:  Jarred Kaiser; Brett Allaire; Paul M Fein; Darlene Lu; Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Serkalem Demissie; Elizabeth J Samelson; Mary L Bouxsein; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Bone mineral density changes after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Kelly Ieong; Jessica Ardila-Gatas; Jie Yang; Xiaoyue Zhang; Stella To Tsui; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.