Literature DB >> 28090446

Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis.

Ling Oei1, Fjorda Koromani1, Fernando Rivadeneira1, M Carola Zillikens2, Edwin H G Oei3.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is characterized by a decreased bone mass and quality resulting in an increased fracture risk. Quantitative imaging methods are critical in the diagnosis and follow-up of treatment effects in osteoporosis. Prior radiographic vertebral fractures and bone mineral density (BMD) as a quantitative parameter derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are among the strongest known predictors of future osteoporotic fractures. Therefore, current clinical decision making relies heavily on accurate assessment of these imaging features. Further, novel quantitative techniques are being developed to appraise additional characteristics of osteoporosis including three-dimensional bone architecture with quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Dedicated high-resolution (HR) CT equipment is available to enhance image quality. At the other end of the spectrum, by utilizing post-processing techniques such as the trabecular bone score (TBS) information on three-dimensional architecture can be derived from DXA images. Further developments in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) seem promising to not only capture bone micro-architecture but also characterize processes at the molecular level. This review provides an overview of various quantitative imaging techniques based on different radiological modalities utilized in clinical osteoporosis care and research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quantitative imaging; computed tomography (CT); dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); osteoporosis; positron emission tomography (PET); radiography

Year:  2016        PMID: 28090446      PMCID: PMC5219969          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2016.12.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  176 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of bone quality in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Matthew T Drake; Shreyasee Amin; L Joseph Melton; Louise K McCready; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Bone microarchitecture assessed by TBS predicts osteoporotic fractures independent of bone density: the Manitoba study.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Andrew L Goertzen; Marc-Antoine Krieg; William D Leslie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Muscle analysis using pQCT, DXA and MRI.

Authors:  M C Erlandson; A L Lorbergs; S Mathur; A M Cheung
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Andreas Biffar; Steven Sourbron; Olaf Dietrich; Gerwin Schmidt; Michael Ingrisch; Maximilian F Reiser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Differences in regional bone perfusion and turnover between lumbar spine and distal humerus: (18)F-fluoride PET study of treatment-naïve and treated postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Michelle L Frost; Glen M Blake; Gary J R Cook; Paul K Marsden; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  MR imaging of the spine: trauma and degenerative disease.

Authors:  J T Wilmink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Bone loss and bone size after menopause.

Authors:  Henrik G Ahlborg; Olof Johnell; Charles H Turner; Gunnar Rannevik; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The associations between QCT-based vertebral bone measurements and prevalent vertebral fractures depend on the spinal locations of both bone measurement and fracture.

Authors:  D E Anderson; S Demissie; B T Allaire; A G Bruno; D L Kopperdahl; T M Keaveny; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Compromised bone marrow perfusion in osteoporosis.

Authors:  James F Griffith; David K W Yeung; Polly H Tsang; Kai C Choi; Timothy C Y Kwok; Anil T Ahuja; Kwok S Leung; Ping C Leung
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Solid-State Quantitative (1)H and (31)P MRI of Cortical Bone in Humans.

Authors:  Alan C Seifert; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.096

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Identifying osteoporotic vertebral endplate and cortex fractures.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Min Deng; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  The Dixon technique for MRI of the bone marrow.

Authors:  Niels van Vucht; Rodney Santiago; Bianca Lottmann; Ian Pressney; Dorothee Harder; Adnan Sheikh; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Vibrational spectroscopic techniques to assess bone quality.

Authors:  E P Paschalis; S Gamsjaeger; K Klaushofer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Informed communication with study subjects of radiographically detected osteoporotic vertebral deformity.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Nazmi Che-Nordin
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-09

5.  Three-Dimensional Characterization of Trabecular Bone Mineral Density of the Distal Radius Utilizing Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Tyler S Pidgeon; Katia A DaSilva; Joseph J Crisco; Eric C Johnson; Alison B Chambers; Manuel F DaSilva
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-18

Review 6.  Clinical utilities of quantitative ultrasound in osteoporosis associated with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Win Min Oo; Vasikaran Naganathan; Myat Thae Bo; David J Hunter
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

7.  What is changed in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: the role of radiologists.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Rosario Francesco Balzano; Xiaoguang Cheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 8.  Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Gabriele Maffi; Jacopo Antonino Vitale; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 10.  Non-oncological applications of RGD-based single-photon emission tomography and positron emission tomography agents.

Authors:  Thomas Ebenhan; Janke Kleynhans; Jan Rijn Zeevaart; Jae Min Jeong; Mike Sathekge
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.