Literature DB >> 8632977

Motor learning by field approximation.

F Gandolfo1, F A Mussa-Ivaldi, E Bizzi.   

Abstract

We investigated how human subjects adapt to forces perturbing the motion of their ams. We found that this kind of learning is based on the capacity of the central nervous system (CNS) to predict and therefore to cancel externally applied perturbing forces. Our experimental results indicate: (i) that the ability of the CNS to compensate for the perturbing forces is restricted to those spatial locations where the perturbations have been experienced by the moving arm. The subjects also are able to compensate for forces experienced at neighboring workspace locations. However, adaptation decays smoothly and quickly with distance from the locations where disturbances had been sensed by the moving limb. (ii) Our experiments also how that the CNS builds an internal model of the external perturbing forces in intrinsic (muscles and / or joints) coordinates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8632977      PMCID: PMC39446          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity.

Authors:  T Poggio; M Fahle; S Edelman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Regularization algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks.

Authors:  T Poggio; F Girosi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Auditory localization in teleoperator and virtual environment systems: ideas, issues, and problems.

Authors:  N Durlach
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory.

Authors:  J R Lackner; P Dizio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Development of sensorially-guided reaching in infant monkeys.

Authors:  R Held; J A Bauer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-05-17       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency.

Authors:  A Fiorentini; N Berardi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total
  167 in total

1.  Central representation of time during motor learning.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; Z M Moussavi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Learning motor synergies makes use of information on muscular load.

Authors:  J Fernández-Ruiz; C Hall-Haro; R Díaz; J Mischner; P Vergara; J C Lopez-Garcia
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The role of vision, speed, and attention in overcoming directional biases during arm movements.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Jacob A Goble
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Vergence-dependent adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Richard A Clendaniel; David S Zee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Context-dependent adaptation of visually-guided arm movements and vestibular eye movements: role of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Accuracy of internal dynamics models in limb movements depends on stability.

Authors:  Theodore E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.