Literature DB >> 10500227

Central representation of time during motor learning.

M A Conditt1, F A Mussa-Ivaldi.   

Abstract

This study stemmed from the observation that the brain of human as well as nonhuman primates is capable of forming and memorizing remarkably accurate internal representations of the dynamics of the arm. These dynamics establish a functional relation between applied force and ensuing arm motion, a relation that generally is quite complex and nonlinear. Current evidence shows that the motor control system is capable of adapting to perturbing forces that depend on motion variables such as position, velocity, and acceleration. The experiments we report here were aimed at establishing whether or not the motor system also may adapt to forces that depend explicitly on time rather than on motion variables. Surprisingly, the experiments suggest a negative answer. When asked to compensate for a predictable and repeated time-varying pattern of disturbing forces, subjects learned to counteract the disturbance by producing forces that did not depend on time but on the velocity and the position of the arm. We conclude from this evidence that time and time-dependent dynamics are not explicitly represented within the neural structures that are responsible for motor adaptation. Although our findings are not sufficient to rule out the presence of a timing structure within the central nervous system, they are consistent with other investigations that conspicuously failed to find evidence for such a central clock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10500227      PMCID: PMC18084          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  PLASTICITY IN HUMAN SENSORIMOTOR CONTROL.

Authors:  R HELD; S J FREEDMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Motor learning by field approximation.

Authors:  F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi; E Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; T Brashers-Krug
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  No clock signal in the discharge of neurons in the deep cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  J G Keating; W T Thach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  On the cerebellum and motor learning.

Authors:  R Llinás; J P Welsh
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Spatial control of arm movements.

Authors:  P Morasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total
  48 in total

1.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Two classes of movements in motor control.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Torres
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Manual skill generalization enhanced by negative viscosity.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Evidence for predictive control in lifting series of virtual objects.

Authors:  Firas Mawase; Amir Karniel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Linear hypergeneralization of learned dynamics across movement speeds reveals anisotropic, gain-encoding primitives for motor adaptation.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Obafunso Ajayi; Gary C Sing; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Generalization as a behavioral window to the neural mechanisms of learning internal models.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Are there distinct neural representations of object and limb dynamics?

Authors:  N Cothros; J D Wong; P L Gribble
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Invariant geometric characteristics of spatial arm motion.

Authors:  Satyajit Ambike; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Vestibular benefits to task savings in motor adaptation.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.