Literature DB >> 15243728

Accuracy of internal dynamics models in limb movements depends on stability.

Theodore E Milner1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the ability to use an internal model of the environmental dynamics when the dynamics were predictable but unstable. Subjects performed goal-directed movements using a robot manipulandum while counteracting a force field, which created instability by assisting the movement in proportion to hand velocity. Subjects' performance was better on the last trial than on the first trial in the force field for all four movement directions tested: out, in, right and left. Subjects adapted to the force field primarily by increasing muscle co-contraction, compared to null field movements, during all phases of movement. This co-contraction generally declined for both the deceleration and stabilization phases during the course of the first 25 movements in each direction, but tended not to decrease significantly thereafter. Catch trials at the end of the learning period suggested that increased viscoelastic impedance due to muscle co-contraction was used to counteract the force field. Only in the case of outward movements were aftereffects observed that were consistent with formation of an accurate internal model of the force field dynamics. Stabilization of the hand for outward movements required less muscle co-contraction than for movements in other directions due to stability conferred by the geometry of the arm. The results suggest that the accuracy of an internal model depends critically on the stability of the coupled dynamics of the limb and the environment.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15243728     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1944-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields.

Authors:  N Bhushan; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment.

Authors:  C D Takahashi; R A Scheidt; D J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning.

Authors:  S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; A M Wing
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Compensation for mechanically unstable loading in voluntary wrist movement.

Authors:  T E Milner; C Cloutier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Human hand impedance characteristics during maintained posture.

Authors:  T Tsuji; P G Morasso; K Goto; K Ito
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  10 in total

1.  Manual skill generalization enhanced by negative viscosity.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  How does visuospatial attention modulate motor preparation during gait initiation?

Authors:  Céline Tard; Kathy Dujardin; Amandine Girard; Marion Debaughrien; Philippe Derambure; Luc Defebvre; Arnaud Delval
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential effects of mental load on proximal and distal arm muscle activity.

Authors:  Jules G Bloemsaat; Ruud G J Meulenbroek; Gerard P Van Galen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans.

Authors:  Theodore E Milner; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Leg muscle recruitment during cycling is less developed in triathletes than cyclists despite matched cycling training loads.

Authors:  Andrew R Chapman; Bill Vicenzino; Peter Blanch; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor lateralization is characterized by a serial hybrid control scheme.

Authors:  V Yadav; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Compensating for intersegmental dynamics across the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints during feedforward and feedback control.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Maeda; Tyler Cluff; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Neuromuscular adaptations to training, injury and passive interventions: implications for running economy.

Authors:  Jason Bonacci; Andrew Chapman; Peter Blanch; Bill Vicenzino
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Muscular activities during sling- and ground-based push-up exercise.

Authors:  Sumiaki Maeo; Tatsuya Chou; Masayoshi Yamamoto; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-03-28

10.  Similarities in the neural control of the shoulder and elbow joints belie their structural differences.

Authors:  Andrew R Karduna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.