Literature DB >> 21279334

The role of vision, speed, and attention in overcoming directional biases during arm movements.

Natalia Dounskaia1, Jacob A Goble.   

Abstract

Previous research has revealed directional biases (preferences to select movements in specific directions) during horizontal arm movements with the use of a free-stroke drawing task. The biases were interpreted as a result of a tendency to generate motion at either the shoulder or elbow (leading joint) and move the other (subordinate) joint predominantly passively to avoid neural effort for control of interaction torque. Here, we examined influence of vision, movement speed, and attention on the directional biases. Participants performed the free-stroke drawing task, producing center-out strokes in randomly selected directions. Movements were performed with and without vision and at comfortable and fast pace. A secondary, cognitive task was used to distract attention. Preferred directions remained the same in all conditions. Bias strength mildly increased without vision, especially during fast movements. Striking increases in bias strength were caused by the secondary task, pointing to additional cognitive load associated with selection of movements in the non-preferred directions. Further analyses demonstrated that the tendency to minimize active interference with interaction torque at the subordinate joint matched directional biases in all conditions. This match supports the explanation of directional biases as a result of a tendency to minimize neural effort for interaction torque control. The cognitive load may enhance this tendency in two ways, directly, by reducing neural capacity for interaction torque control, and indirectly, by decreasing capacity of working memory that stores visited directions. The obtained results suggest strong directional biases during daily activities because natural arm movements usually subserve cognitive tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279334     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2547-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Interjoint coordination during handwriting-like movements.

Authors:  N Dounskaia; A W Van Gemmert; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Commonalities and differences in control of various drawing movements.

Authors:  N Dounskaia; C J Ketcham; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Hierarchical control of different elbow-wrist coordination patterns.

Authors:  N V Dounskaia; S P Swinnen; C B Walter; A J Spaepen; S M Verschueren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Variables that influence the generation of random sequences: an update.

Authors:  P Brugger
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1997-04

7.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans.

Authors:  F A Mussa-Ivaldi; N Hogan; E Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Random generation and the executive control of working memory.

Authors:  A Baddeley; H Emslie; J Kolodny; J Duncan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1998-11

9.  Directional biases reveal utilization of arm's biomechanical properties for optimization of motor behavior.

Authors:  Jacob A Goble; Yanxin Zhang; Yury Shimansky; Siddharth Sharma; Natalia V Dounskaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Time-varying mechanical behavior of multijointed arm in man.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; M Carrozzo; N A Borghese
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Travis Johnson; Robert L Sainburg; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of intersegmental dynamics in coordination of the forelimb joints during unperturbed and perturbed skilled locomotion.

Authors:  Humza N Zubair; Erik E Stout; Natalia Dounskaia; Irina N Beloozerova
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Strategy of arm movement control is determined by minimization of neural effort for joint coordination.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Yury Shimansky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Preferred directions of arm movements are independent of visual perception of spatial directions.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Wanyue Wang; Robert L Sainburg; Andrzej Przybyla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Influence of workspace constraints on directional preferences of 3D arm movements.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Fix your eyes in the space you could reach: neurons in the macaque medial parietal cortex prefer gaze positions in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Kostas Hadjidimitrakis; Rossella Breveglieri; Giacomo Placenti; Annalisa Bosco; Silvio P Sabatini; Patrizia Fattori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Force Generation in a Two-Joint Arm Model: Analysis of the Joint Torques in the Working Space.

Authors:  Alexander I Kostyukov; Tomasz Tomiak
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Load emphasizes muscle effort minimization during selection of arm movement direction.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.