Literature DB >> 10940319

Learning motor synergies makes use of information on muscular load.

J Fernández-Ruiz1, C Hall-Haro, R Díaz, J Mischner, P Vergara, J C Lopez-Garcia.   

Abstract

Prism adaptation, a form of procedural learning, requires the integration of visual and motor information for its proper acquisition. Although the role of the visual feedback has begun to be understood, the nature of the motor information necessary for the development of the adaptation remains unknown. In this work we have tested the idea that modifying the arm load at different stages of the adaptation process, and the ensuing change of motor information perceived by the subjects, would modify the final properties of the adaptation. We trained a set of subjects to throw balls to a target while wearing prism glasses and varied the weight of their arms at different time points during the task. We observed that the acquisition of the adaptation was not affected by the change in load. However, its persistence (i.e., the aftereffect) was reduced when tested under a weight condition different from the training trials. Furthermore, when the training weight conditions were restored later during testing, a second, late aftereffect was unmasked, suggesting that the missing aftereffect did not disappear but had remained latent. Our results show that the internal representation of a motor memory incorporates information about load conditions and that the memory stored under a specific weight condition can be fully retrieved only when the original training condition is restored.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10940319      PMCID: PMC311333          DOI: 10.1101/lm.7.4.193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  16 in total

1.  Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion.

Authors:  R W SPERRY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1950-12

2.  Trajectories of reaches to prismatically-displaced targets: evidence for "automatic" visuomotor recalibration.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Research on adaptation to rearranged vision: 1966-1974.

Authors:  R B Welch
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Evidence for a three-component model of prism adaptation.

Authors:  R B Welch; C S Choe; D R Heinrich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-10

Review 5.  Feedback control of skeletal muscles.

Authors:  J Houk; E Henneman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision.

Authors:  C S Harris
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Adaptation to displaced vision: a change in the central control of sensorimotor coordination.

Authors:  M E Hardt; R Held; M J Steinbach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-08

8.  Effects of delayed visual information on the rate and amount of prism adaptation in the human.

Authors:  S Kitazawa; T Kohno; T Uka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Adaptation to laterally displaced vision: a review.

Authors:  A S Kornheiser
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  9 in total

1.  Rapid topographical plasticity of the visuomotor spatial transformation.

Authors:  Juan Fernandez-Ruiz; Rosalinda Diaz; Pablo Moreno-Briseño; Aurelio Campos-Romo; Rafael Ojeda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 neurodegeneration differentially affects error-based and strategic-based visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Israel Vaca-Palomares; Rosalinda Díaz; Roberto Rodríguez-Labrada; Jacqeline Medrano-Montero; Yaimé Vázquez-Mojena; Luis Velázquez-Pérez; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Balance affects prism adaptation: evidence from the latent aftereffect.

Authors:  Dobromir G Dotov; Till D Frank; Michael T Turvey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Relative errors can cue absolute visuomotor mappings.

Authors:  Loes C J van Dam; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Mapping shape to visuomotor mapping: learning and generalisation of sensorimotor behaviour based on contextual information.

Authors:  Loes C J van Dam; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Limited Plasticity of Prismatic Visuomotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Karoline Spang; Sven Wischhusen; Manfred Fahle
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-04-10

7.  Does anodal cerebellar tDCS boost transfer of after-effects from throwing to pointing during prism adaptation?

Authors:  Lisa Fleury; Francesco Panico; Alexandre Foncelle; Patrice Revol; Ludovic Delporte; Sophie Jacquin-Courtois; Christian Collet; Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-27

8.  Verbal and visual stimulation effects on rectus femoris and biceps femoris muscles during isometric and concentric.

Authors:  Sidney B Silva; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Vitor E Valenti; Daniel V Nogueira; Eder R Moraes; Vilma Natividade; Paulo Rogério Gallo; Dafne Herrero; Patrícia M D Zacaro
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2013-10-08

9.  Unusual prism adaptation reveals how grasping is controlled.

Authors:  Willemijn D Schot; Eli Brenner; Jeroen Bj Smeets
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.