Literature DB >> 1790411

Bone mineral density of the hip measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal elderly women and in patients with hip fracture.

F Duboeuf1, P Braillon, M C Chapuy, P Haond, C Hardouin, M F Meary, P D Delmas, P J Meunier.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in 133 normal females on five regions of the femoral site: neck, trochanteric, intertrochanteric, Ward's triangle, and total area of the proximal femur. One hundred and twenty-five women (56 older than 65, range 65-97, and 69 with an age range of 21-65) were also examined for spinal bone mineral density. The mean in vivo precision (CV%) of the measurements with repositioning assessed on five young and eight elderly patients was ranged from 0.7% to 1.7% but lower for Ward's triangle (CV = 2.95% and 3.87%). Between 30 and 90 years, a linear age-related bone mineral decrease was found at all sites with a similar magnitude of bone loss for the femoral neck, total or intertrochanteric regions (-33% to -39%). A greater decrease was found for the Ward's triangle region (-61%). In the subgroup of elderly women (65-97 years old), the lumbar BMD measured with an anteroposterior incidence did not decrease significantly with age, contrasting with an average 27% decrease of the BMD of the hip between 65 and 90 years of age. In addition, 31 patients suffering either from a cervical (n = 12) or pertrochanteric (n = 19) fracture were measured on their contralateral femur 15 to 30 days after the fracture event. The mean calculated BMD values were, depending on the measured area, from 14% to 21% lower than those reported for age-matched controls (z-score from -1.11 to -0.65). A fracture threshold was determined for each site from this population and the elderly controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1790411     DOI: 10.1007/bf03187468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  26 in total

1.  [Measurement of bone mineral content by quantitative digital radiography. First results in the lumbar vertebrae].

Authors:  P Braillon; F Duboeuf; M F Meary; P Barret; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1989-05-27       Impact factor: 1.228

2.  The effect of age and menopause on bone mineral density of the proximal femur.

Authors:  L R Hedlund; J C Gallagher
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography.

Authors:  C C Glüer; P Steiger; R Selvidge; K Elliesen-Kliefoth; C Hayashi; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D Uebelhart; F Duboeuf; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Bone mineral density in Australia compared with the United States.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; R B Mazess; P N Sambrook; M G Yeates; J Freund
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  A comparison of single and multi-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Bone mineral density in the femoral neck: quantitative assessment using dual-energy projection radiography.

Authors:  D J Sartoris; F G Sommer; R Marcus; P Madvig
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Pødenphant; B J Riis; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Detection of prefracture spinal osteoporosis using bone mineral absorptiometry.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  26 in total

1.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Menopause-related changes in bone mineral density in Japanese women: a longitudinal study on lumbar spine and proximal femur.

Authors:  T Tsunenari; S Yamada; M Kawakatsu; H Negishi; M Tsutsumi
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; R Deroisy; B Zegels; I Jupsin; A Albert; P Franchimont
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Effects of age and menopause on bone density of entire skeleton in healthy and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  R Nuti; G Martini
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Spine and femur density and broadband ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus in normal Spanish women.

Authors:  S Palacios; C Menéndez; J Calderón; S Rubio
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss by rectal calcitonin.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; I Jupsin; R Deroisy; I Biquet; N Franchimont; P Franchimont
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Differences in hip bone mineral density may explain the hip fracture pattern in osteoarthritic hips.

Authors:  Olof Wolf; Håkan Ström; Jan Milbrink; Sune Larsson; Hans Mallmin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 8.  Bone remodeling in hip fracture.

Authors:  J Reeve; J M Zanelli; N Garrahan; J N Bradbeer; J S Wand; S T Moyes; J P Roux; T Smith
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: which technique discriminates fracture risk.

Authors:  A Stewart; D M Reid; R W Porter
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 10.  Can we stop bone loss and prevent hip fractures in the elderly?

Authors:  P J Meunier; M C Chapuy; M E Arlot; P D Delmas; F Duboeuf
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.