Literature DB >> 7796342

Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans.

K G Faulkner1, H K Genant, M McClung.   

Abstract

Dominant/nondominant differences in bone mineral density (BMD) have been observed in the upper extremities. However for the proximal femur, the distinction between dominant and nondominant hips is not clear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate left/right variations in femoral BMD and hip axis length (HAL) in both single beam and fan beam dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. A total of 36 women aged 41-76 years (average age 60 +/- 10 years) received single beam and fan beam DXA scans of both proximal femora with a Hologic QDR-2000 scanner. Femoral BMD and hip axis length were determined for each scan. Left/right and single beam/fan beam correlations were determined and differences were evaluated using a two-way analysis of variance. Femoral BMD at corresponding measurement regions in opposing femora were highly correlated (r = 0.81-0.96). No significant left/right differences were detected. At the femoral neck, the mean BMD difference (+/- standard deviation) was 1.5% +/- 4.7% in a single beam mode and -0.6% +/- 6.3% in fan beam mode. Though mean values of femoral BMD were equivalent, the observed individual left/right differences were occasionally large (as high as 26% in the femoral neck). The hip axis length of the left and right hips were highly correlated and statistically equivalent. However, hip axis length using fan beam was significantly larger (7.5%) than the single beam measurement with a larger observed variation. We conclude that measurement of a single proximal femur will usually be sufficient for clinical evaluation of BMD and/or hip axis length.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7796342     DOI: 10.1007/bf00298740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  11 in total

1.  Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; C C Glüer; M Estilo; H K Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis?

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; C Ribot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Variation between femurs as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Authors:  M L Hall; J Heavens; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1991

5.  Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision.

Authors:  K Lai; M Rencken; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  The symmetry of hip bone mineral density. A dual photon absorptiometry approach.

Authors:  H J Lessig; M S Meltzer; J A Siegel
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 7.794

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  C C Glüer; S R Cummings; A Pressman; J Li; K Glüer; K G Faulkner; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites.

Authors:  L J Melton; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; H W Wahner; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M McClung; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  14 in total

1.  Hip axis length in mid-life Japanese and Caucasian U.S. residents: no evidence for an ethnic difference.

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; Jean T Young; Mei-Hua Huang; Alexander Bucur; Yan Wang; Teresa Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Image resolution and magnification using a cone beam densitometer: optimizing data acquisition for hip morphometric analysis.

Authors:  V Boudousq; D Mariano Goulart; J M Dinten; C Caderas de Kerleau; E Thomas; O Mares; P O Kotzki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  Update on bone density testing.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Geometric characteristics of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  P Geusens
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density.

Authors:  R Hamdy; G M Kiebzak; E Seier; N B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Differentiation between post-menopausal women with and without hip fractures: enhanced evaluation of clinical DXA by topological analysis of the mineral distribution in the scan images.

Authors:  H F Boehm; T Vogel; A Panteleon; D Burklein; H Bitterling; M Reiser
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The diagnostic role of dual femur bone density measurement in low-impact fractures.

Authors:  Joseph C H Wong; Louise McEwan; Naomi Lee; Matthew R Griffiths; Nicholas A Pocock
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Using Radon transform of standard radiographs of the hip to differentiate between post-menopausal women with and without fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  H F Boehm; J Lutz; M Körner; W Mutschler; M Reiser; K-J Pfeifer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Local topological analysis of densitometer-generated scan images of the proximal femur for differentiation between patients with hip fracture and age-matched controls.

Authors:  H F Boehm; J Lutz; A Horng; M Notohamiprodjo; A Panteleon; K-J Pfeifer; M Reiser
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.