Literature DB >> 2133637

Which bone to measure?

A G Need, B E Nordin.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1990        PMID： 2133637     DOI： 10.1007/bf01880409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN： 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


× No keyword cloud information.
  22 in total

1.  Noninvasive axial and peripheral assessment of bone mineral content: a comparison between osteoporotic women and normal subjects.

Authors:  F N Van Berkum; J C Birkenhäger; L C Van Veen; J Zeelenberg; D H Birkenhäger-Frenkel; W T Trouerbach; T Stijnen; H A Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  The definition and diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B E Nordin
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Bone density measurement.

Authors:  L J Melton; H W Wahner; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  A comparison of single and multi-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  The relative contributions of age and years since menopause to postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  B E Nordin; A G Need; B E Chatterton; M Horowitz; H A Morris
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; E Seeman; K P Offord; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K A Johnson; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Pødenphant; B J Riis; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  The relation between forearm and vertebral mineral density and fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  B E Nordin; J M Wishart; M Horowitz; A G Need; A Bridges; M Bellon
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-10

10.  Detection of prefracture spinal osteoporosis using bone mineral absorptiometry.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.741
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  [Osteosonography of the phalanges of men].

Authors:  T Soballa; J Schlegel; R Cadossi; R Isani; P Heilmann; R Ziegler; C Wüster
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-03-15

5.  Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis?

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; C Ribot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision.

Authors:  K Lai; M Rencken; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Distal radius fracture is an early sign of general osteoporosis: bone mass measurements in a population-based study.

Authors:  H Mallmin; S Ljunghall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Bone mineral density of the hip measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal elderly women and in patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; P Braillon; M C Chapuy; P Haond; C Hardouin; M F Meary; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Forearm BMD as measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in a German reference population.

Authors:  S Butz; C Wüster; C Scheidt-Nave; M Götz; R Ziegler
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Discrimination of total body bone mineral density measured by dexa in vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  A Bagur; E Vega; C Mautalen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.333
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.